Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE AND THE THEORY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-3-34-53

Abstract

The article represents the review of the development of practice and  theory of civil and military relations (CMR) in post- Soviet Russia.  The problem of their reorganization sharply rose in latest years of  existence of the USSR due to the change of the model of social  development, decay of the country and its armed forces that  possessed nuclear weapon. There was a danger of loss of control  over army and of its transformation into independent political force.  In these conditions emerged complex application-oriented and  theoretical problems of CMR which resolution was aggravated by the  absence of scientific development and specialized institutes, and by  the resistance of conservative circles. During the post-Soviet period  there was created the legal basis of CMR and specialized non-state  institutes appeared. Public and military authorities were adapting to  the changing conditions. In 2004 the domination of the Minister of Defense over the General Staff was legislatively fixed. Positive changes also happened in the sphere of transparency of  army for society, the expert activity of institutes of civil society  connected to the sphere of security and defense gained  development. So in Russia was approved the model of CMR that  provided the prevalence of the policy over army and it was the result of wide range of political, legal, social and economic,  organizational-administrative, image and educational measures. The  developed model reflects specifics of the Russian policy: violation of  balance of the authorities towards executive power, its personification; palliative and declarative character of the legal  regulation, etc. It is necessary to mention the absence of steady  institutional guarantees against usurpation of the power in a long-term perspective.  Democratic evolution of CMR didn’t acquire irreversible character. The intensive phase of theoretical consideration of CMR  came to the end by the middle of the first decade of the new century that can be easily explained by the lowering of attention of  the citizens to the army due to the measures taken, absence of the  request for researches, etc. Thus, CMR in Russia have wide range of  theoretical and practical problems that need solution.

About the Author

V. K. BELOZEROV
Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Political Sciences, Head of the Department of Political Sciences, Moscow State Linguistic University

38, ul. Ostozhenka, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119034



References

1. 35 years of information structures of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. (2006). Moskva: Agentstvo “Voeninform” MO RF. 272.

2. Actual aims of the development of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. (2004). Moskva: Agentstvo “Voeninform” MO RF. 104.

3. Akhromeev S.F. (1991). From history to modernity. “Well-forgotten past”. A collection of articles. Moskva: Voenizdat. 151–189.

4. An Officer of the Armed Forces (US Department of Defense). (1996). Moskva. 129.

5. Arbatov A.G. (1999). Civil control on the military organization: is it possible to manage an army without stars? Security: the Russian choice. Moskva: EPItsentr. 104–122.

6. Chaldymova N.A., Cherkasenko A.I. (eds.). (1990). Army and Society. Moskva: Progress. 432.

7. Danilova N.Yu. (2007). Army and society: the principles of cooperation. Sankt.- Peterburg: Norma. 344.

8. Dolgov K.M. (ed.). (1997). Constitutional Democracy and Civil-Military Relations: Proceedings of the Russian-American Scientific and Practical Seminar. Moskva: Nauchnaya kniga. 188.

9. Dose F. (1996). The Military in the Parliament, 1989–1995. Polis. Political Studies, (3). 79–85.

10. Gareev M.A. (1995). If tomorrow war comes? (What will change in the nature of the armed struggle in the next 20–25 years). Moskva: VlaDar. 238.

11. Gerasimov A.V. (1994). Public opinion and military policy (political analysis). Moskva: GA VS. 160.

12. Gorbachev M.S. (1988). Perestroika and new thinking for our country and for the world. Moskva: Politizdat. 271.

13. Gorbunov A.A. (2011). A world of khaki color. Armed forces in the system of state power. Moskva: Tsentr analiza strategii i tekhnologii. 208.

14. Hagena H., Savinkin A. (eds.). (1999). Civilian control over the armed forces: foreign experience and specifics of Russia: Materials of the TACIS project in 1997– 1998. Moskva: Russkii put’. 240.

15. Khundt U.A. (1990). System of internal management. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal, (7). 47–49.

16. Kortunov S.V. (2007). National and international security: the conceptual framework. Moskva: Izd. dom GU VShE. 397.

17. Lavrent’ev A.V. (2005). Civilian control over the armed forces and intelligence services in the United States (according to US sources). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo MGOU. 140.

18. Lobov V.N. (1991). Military reform: the connection of times. Moskva: AVIAR. 164.

19. Maslyuk S.G. (1998). Civil-military relations in Russia. Issues of democratic control on the military sphere. Moskva: Tsentr politicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii. 127.

20. Mikhailenok O.M. (2006). State and army in Russia. 19th – 21st centuries. Moskva: 2006. 332.

21. Military reform: history and prospects: a collection. (1991). Moskva: Izdatel’skoe predpriyatie “Obnovlenie”. 171.

22. Mirskii G.I. (1989). The role of the army in the political life of the Third World countries. Moskva: Nauka. 317.

23. New thinking and military policy: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. (1989). Moskva: MO SSSR. 413.

24. Nikitin A.I. (ed.). (2002). Democratic control over the military sphere in Russia and the CIS countries. Moskva: Izd-vo “Eslan”. 248.

25. Panchenko L.P. (1994). The army and the modernization of society (the experience of Indonesia). Moskva: Nauka; Izdatel’skaya firma “Vostochnaya literatura”. 200.

26. Parfenov V.G. (2002). Public relations in the management of a military organization: the problems of institutionalization: a monograph. Moskva: VU. 182.

27. Parliamentary control over the security sector: principles, mechanisms and practical aspects. (2004). Moskva: Fond razvitiya politicheskogo tsentrizma. 260.

28. Perry W.J. (2003). Preventive Defense: A New US Security Strategy. Moskva: Nauka. 230. Pogorelyi M., Safranchuk I. (eds.).

29. (2002). Modern Russian military journalism: experience, problems, prospects. Moskva:

30. Gendal’f. 253.

31. Prokop’ev V.P. (1982). Army and state in the history of Germany of 10th – 20th centuries. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta. 129.

32. Public control of the national security policy: Materials of the round table: Scientific publication. (2007). Moskva: Nauchnyi ekspert. 328.

33. Sergeev I.D. (2002). From global confrontation to local problems. Otechestvennye zapiski, (8). 119–122.

34. Shlykov V.V. (2000). Does Russia need the General Staff? The Russian system of higher military command in the international context. Moskva: Mezhregional’nyi fond informatsionnykh tekhnologii. 64.

35. Shlykov V.V. (2004). Call experts to the army. Rossiya v global’noi politike, (2). 14–19.

36. Shlykov V.V. (2009). The military reform of Anatoly Serdyukov as a victory of common

37. sense. Vozdushno-kosmicheskaya oborona, (3). 46–57.

38. Stepanova E.A. (2001). Civil-military relations in non-military operations. Moskva: “Prava cheloveka”. 272.

39. Taylor B.D. (2003). Politics and the Russian Army. Civil-Military Relations, 1689– 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 355.

40. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation 2005. (2006). Moskva: RITs MO RF. 292.

41. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation: modernization and development prospects. (2012). Moskva: Izdatel’skii dom “Natsional’naya oborona”. 348.

42. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation 2006. (2007). Moskva: Agentstvo “Voeninform” MO RF. 624.

43. The concept of military reform (draft). (1990). Voennaya mysl’ (special issue). 24.

44. The current status of civil-military relations and the state management of the security sector in Russia: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. (2005). Moskva: Nauchnyi ekspert. 382.

45. The main directions of military development in European countries: Conference materials. (2001). Moskva. 148.

46. Tsybakov D.L. (2012). Militarization of international politics: the consequences for interests and security of Russia: a monograph. Moskva: MAKS Press. 236.

47. Vladimirov A.I. (1988). On some issues of deepening the restructuring of military service. Voennaya mysl’ (10). 43–54.

48. Yazov D.T. (1990). Military reform. Moskva: Voenizdat. 80.


Review

For citations:


BELOZEROV V.K. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE AND THE THEORY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(3):34-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-3-34-53

Views: 1589


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)