Politicization of Ethnic Identity: Western Technologies for Constructing Ethnonational Splits in Russia After the Start of the Special Military Operation

After the start of the special military operation in Ukraine, the collective West uses the politicization of ethnicity as one of the tools of competition with the Russian Federation. The research is based on an interdisciplinary methodology that includes geopolitical, civilizational, instrumentalist, and discursive approaches. The article analyzes the content of mass media and Telegram channels, the activities of organizations created and/or operating under the leadership of Western countries, which politicize and mobilize the ethnic identity of peoples living on the territory of the Russian Federation at the discursive and non-discursive levels. The authors conclude that these processes are implemented through the following political technologies: 1) positioning Russia as a “colonial empire” and an existential “enemy” of various ethnonational groups; 2) the imposition of ideas about alleged discrimination of various ethnic groups by the Russian Federation; 3) appeal to the negative aspects of the shared past of Russia and the peoples living on its territory; 4) the construction of national identity based on anti-Russian meanings; 5) the opposition of ethnic groups living in the subjects of the Russian Federation to state authorities in particular and Russia as a whole. The authors also conclude that the public rhetoric of the collective West in relation to interethnic processes in the Russian Federation is getting tougher every year and acquires a higher level of frankness and political realism: the theses about democracy and human rights violations are not the key ones, this role is assigned to the statements about the need to deprive Russia of its resources (territorial and hydrocarbon ones, nuclear weapons, etc.).

1. Achkasova V.A. (2016). Political mobilization in ethnic conflicts. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. No. 5, pp. 37–49 (in Russian).

2. “Dekolonizatsiya”… (2024). Demeshko N.Е., Muradov G.L., Irkhin A.A., Moskalenko O.A. “Decolonization” and “Deimperialization”: Modern Western Policy Towards Fragmentation of Russia. Regionologiya. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 10–30 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.010-030.

3. Demeshko N.E., Irkhin A.A. (2023). Russia and Great Britain: a National Factor in the Competition of Great Powers. Dialogue with Time. No. 81, pp. 215–231 (in Russian).

4. Denisova G.S. (1997). The social subjectivity of an ethnic group (a conceptual approach). Rostov-on-Don, 52 pp. (in Russian).

5. Esman M. (1994). Ethnic Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 277 pp.

6. Ethnicity… (1975). Glazer N., Moynihan D. (eds.). Ethnicity. Theory and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 531 pp.

7. Gurr T.R. (1995). Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflicts: Exit, Autonomy or Access? Conflict Transformation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-23823-1_1.

8. Horowitz D.L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 697 pp.

9. Igosheva M.A. (2020). The political resource of ethnic identity in the context

10. of the transformation of the modern world order. Sociodynamics. No. 5, pp. 26–42 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.5.33026.

11. Kasyanov G.V. (2019). Ukraine and Its Neighbors: The Historical Politics. 1987–2018. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 632 pp. (in Russian).

12. Kommunikativniye tekhnologii… (2016). Communicative technologies in the processes of political mobilization: a collective monograph. Moscow, 248 pp. (in Russian).

13. Maksimova O.N. (2015). Political subjectivity of an ethnic group or ethnicity in the public sphere. Electronic scientific journal “Modern Society and Power”. No. 3 (5), pp. 77–82 (in Russian).

14. Malkova V.K. (2020). Ethnicity and Media: Experiences of Ethnopolitical Analysis of Modern Russian Mass Media. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Antropology of the RAS, 420 pp. (in Russian). Miller A.I. (2009). Russia: power and history. Pro et Contra. Vol. 13, no. 3–4, pp. 6–23 (in Russian).

15. Oskolkov P. (2021). Politicization of eth-nicity and related phenomena. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 131–138 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-8-131-138.

16. Rothschild J. (1981). Ethnopolitics: A Conceptual Framework. New York: Columbia University Press, 290 pp.

17. Russkiy i Tyurkskiy miri… (2023). Demeshko N.E., Muradov G.L., Irkhin A.A., Moskalenko O.A. (2023). Russian and Turkic worlds in Eurasia. MGIMO Review of International Relations. Vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 153–182 (in Rus-sian). DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2023-6-93-153-182.

18. Shnirelman V.А. (2023). Social Trauma and Specifi cs of Memory. Ethnographic Review. No. 1, pp. 5–10 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0869541523010013.

19. Smith A. (2025). Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. Moscow: Totenburg, 2025. 260 pp. (in Russian).

20. Smith A.D. (1999). Myths and memories of the nation. New York: Oxford University Press, 298 pp.

21. Tishkov V.A. (2001). Ethnology and Politics. Scientific Journalism. Moscow: Nauka, 240 pp. (in Russian).

22. Zdravomyslov A.G., Tsutsiev A.A. (2003). Ethnicity and ethnic violence: the confrontation of theoretical paradigms. Sociological Journal. No. 3, pp. 20–50 (in Russian).