Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

The United States ‘Exit Tax’: Legal Framework and Its Implications for Human Rights

https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.06.07

Abstract

Amid increasing global mobility of taxpayers and their assets, the issue of taxation upon migration between tax jurisdictions has become particularly relevant. This article is dedicated to an analysis of the “exit tax” regime in the United States, where a tax is levied on citizens as they exit the national tax jurisdiction.
The article provides an overview of the U.S. taxation system, the evolution of legislation regarding the exit tax regime, and its impact on human rights. The U.S. taxes the worldwide income of its citizens and residents – including income, inheritance, and gift taxes – while non-resident foreigners are taxed only on income earned within the U.S. These differences in taxation may prompt some U.S. citizens to renounce their citizenship in order to be taxed as non-resident foreigners. The right to renounce citizenship is internationally recognized, and any restriction on this right must be strictly justified. The findings of this article suggest that the introduction of the exit tax may significantly constrain the right to renounce citizenship, creating practical obstacles for expatriates. Among these are additional administrative barriers and the necessity to liquidate assets to meet tax obligations. The author concludes that these measures cast doubt on the effectiveness of the tax in terms of budgetary gains, as it restricts individual rights and disrupts the balance between state interests and human rights. 

About the Author

E. Sh. Saliakhutdinov
Limited Liability Company “BST Consulting”; National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Emil Sh. SALIAKHUTDINOV

Tax Consultant; Student of the “Master-PhD” Program of the Faculty of Law

Lesnaya Street, 5, Moscow, 125047 

Bolshoi Tryokhsvyatitelsky Lane, 3, Moscow, 109028



References

1. Andrianova N.G. (2021). The establishment of an “exit tax” as a potential way to broaden Russian deoffshorization measures. Jurist. No. 4, pp. 55–58 (in Russian).

2. Appleby A.D. (2022). No Migration Without Taxation: State Exit Taxes. Harvard Journal on Legislation. Vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 55–100.

3. Avi-Yonah R.S. (2010). The Case Against Taxing Citizens. Tax Notes International. Vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 389–394.

4. Berg M.E. (2012). Bar the Exit (Tax)! Section 877A, the Constitutional Prohibition Against Unapportioned Direct Taxes and the Realization Requirement. Tax Lawyer. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–216.

5. De Juan J.C. (2021). The internal transposition of the exit tax harmonized by the anti-tax avoidance directive into the Spanish tax system. Crónica Tributaria. Vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 11–40 (in Spanish). DOI: 10.47092/CT.21.4.1.

6. Fachrizal S., Hanum I.U. (2024). Exit tax adoption to protect Indonesia’s tax base: Are we ready? Scientax. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–130. DOI: 10.52869/st.v5i2.449.

7. Farkas-DiNardo E. (2023). Is the Nation of Immigrants Punishing Its Emmigrants: A Critical Review of the Expatriation Rules Revised by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Florida Tax Review. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–43.

8. Kirsch M. (2004). Alternative Sanctions and the Federal Tax Law: Symbols, Shaming, and Social Norm Management as a Substitute for Effective Tax Policy. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 865–939.

9. Nowak M. (2005). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary. Kehl, Germany: N.P. Engel Publishers, 1277 pp.

10. Organ P.R. (2022). Citizenship and taxes. International Tax and Public Finance. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 404–453. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-022-09767-5.

11. Polyanina A.K. (2013). The Principle of Personal Autonomy in Constitutional Law. Law and politics. No. 13, pp. 1842–1848 (in Russian). DOI: 10.7256/1811–9018.2013.13.9824.

12. Snyder L. (2023). The Myths and Truths of Extraterritorial Taxation. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 187–266.

13. Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (2003). Review of the Present-law Tax and immigration Treatment of Relinquishment off Citizenship and Termination of Long-term Residency. 321 pp. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CPRT-JCS-2-03/pdf/GPO-CPRT-JCS-2-03.pdf, accessed 14.10.2024.

14. Staff of Joint Committee on Taxation (2008). Technical Explanation of H.R. 6081, the «Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008», as Scheluled for Consideration by the House of Representatives. 52 pp. Available at: https://www.jct.gov/getattachment/20cfb0f1-760b-470c-a0377ba776a58b9f/x-44-08-1295.pdf, accessed 14.10.2024.

15. Steven A.J. (2009). Surviving a Heart Attack: Expatriation and the Tax Policy Implications of the New Exit Tax. Akron Tax Journal. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 37–68.

16. Tang E. (2006). Solving Taxpatriation: “Realizing” It Takes More Than Amending the Alternative Tax. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 615–645.

17. Trzcina S. (2020). Assessment on the compliance of Polish exit tax with EU law. Prawo Budżetowe Państwa i Samorządu. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 95–111. DOI: 10.12775/ PBPS.2020.025.

18. Walker A. (2005). The Tax Regime for Individual Expatriates: Whom To impress? Tax Lawyer. Vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 555–598.

19. William L.D., Manolakas C. (2012). The Exit Tax: A Move in the Right Direction. William & Mary Business Law Review. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 341–417.

20. Worster W. (2017). Human Rights Law and the Taxation Consequences for Renouncing Citizenship. St. Louis University Law Journal. Vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 85–101.


Review

For citations:


Saliakhutdinov E.Sh. The United States ‘Exit Tax’: Legal Framework and Its Implications for Human Rights. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(6):111–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.06.07

Views: 8


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)