Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

The Impact of International Environmental Standards on Corporate Financial Performance: An Economic and Legal Analysis

https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.06.05

Abstract

The article focuses on analyzing the relationship between investor reactions to a company’s compliance with international environmental standards and its financial performance. This analysis helps determine whether investor responses to a company’s actions or inactions regarding such compliance affect its financial efficiency. Using the experiences of Russian and foreign companies as examples, the article describes how adherence to international environmental standards influences business-investor relations and how investor reactions to companies complying with these standards may contribute to the growth of their market capitalization. The analysis examines the connection between investor responses to ESG reports published by companies and performance indicators such as ROA, ROE, and market capitalization, drawing on examples from several resource companies, the aviation industry, and the banking sector. The author concludes that compliance with international environmental standards has a positive impact on a company’s financial performance, provided that the company maintains relatively stable financial conditions and operates in a favorable economic environment. However, during market crises – such as the pandemic or the imposition of economic sanctions – an effective ESG policy cannot fully prevent a decline in market capitalization. According to the author, the trend of popularizing international environmental standards within the business community is likely to continue, as compliance with such standards can offer companies a tangible market advantage under favorable external conditions. 

About the Author

V. A. Gabrielov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Vadim A. GABRIELOV

PhD Student of the Department of International Law 

Myasnickaya Street 20, Moscow, 101000



References

1. A Differentiation of… (2023). Fura B. et al. A Differentiation of the Benefits of ISO 14001 Adoption in Manufacturing Companies. Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 30, no. 4, part 1, pp. 49–70. DOI: 10.7862/rz.2023.hss.42.

2. Almeyda R., Darmansya A. (2019). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Financial Performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series. No. 5, pp. 278–290. DOI: 10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340.

3. Anklesaria-Dalal K., Thaker N.A. (2019). ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: A Panel Study of Indian Companies. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371177996_ESG_and_Corporate_Financial_Performance_A_Panel_Study_of_Indian_Companies, accessed 05.10.2024.

4. Apergis N., Poufinas T., Antonopoulos A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics. Vol. 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186.

5. Ashok S., Dhingra D. (2023). Application of Integrated Reporting – A Case Study of Tata Steel. In: Lee K.H., Senaratne S., Gunarathne N. (eds.). Integrated Reporting (IR) for Sustainability. EcoEfficiency in Industry and Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 141–159. DOI: 10.1007/9783-031-41833-4_6.

6. Bizoumi T., Lazaridis S., Stamou N. (2019). Innovation in Stock Exchanges: Driving ESG Disclosure and Performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 72–79. DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12348.

7. Bodhanwala S., Bodhanwala R. (2022). Exploring relationship between sustainability and firm performance in travel and tourism industry: a global evidence. Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1251–1269. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-092020-0360.

8. Cai Z.D., Qian M.Y., Wang L.J. (2023). Comprehensive ESG Score and Financial Performance of Carbon-Neutral Concept Enterprises. Open Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 133–148. DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.111008.

9. Coleman L. (2011). Losses from Failure of Stakeholder Sensitive Processes: Financial Consequences for Large US Companies from Breakdowns in Product, Environmental, and Accounting Standards. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 247–258. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-0100544-8.

10. Dewi A.K., Harto P. (2023). The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on the Company’s Market Value in Indonesia. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 608–619. DOI: 10.21107/pamator.v16i3.19923.

11. For whom… (2022). Gubareva M. et al. For whom does it pay to be a moral capitalist? Sustainability of corporate financial performance of ESG investment. PLoS ONE. Vol. 18, no. 5. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285027.

12. Hamdi K., Guenich H., Ben Saada M. (2022). Does corporate financial performance promote ESG: Evidence from US firms. Cogent Business & Management. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2154053.

13. Herman B.D. (2022). Meta Ethics: How Ignoring Stakeholder Interests Endangers Meta/Facebook. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 58–72. DOI: 10.33423/jlae.v19i3.5442.

14. Jiang P.-C. (2024). National ESG index update: An assessment of the G20 countries. Innovation and Green Development. Vol. 3, no. 2, article 100147. DOI: 10.1016/j.igd.2024.100147.

15. Kelkar V., Katole H.J. (2023). An overview of non-financial reporting practices around the world. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2699–2710. Available at: https://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v11i02c/v11i23-08.pdf, accessed 07.11.2024.

16. Khodijah A.S. (2022). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Foreign Investment. Journal of Accounting and Investment. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 64–83. DOI: 10.18196/jai.v24i1.16033.

17. Kolodnjaja G.V. (2023). ESG-transformation in Russian business. Economics: Theory and Practice. Vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 10–16 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31429/2224042X_2023_69_10.

18. Lee E., Jung C.S., Kwak J. (2016). The Role of Trade Associations in Environmental Compliance Under Limited Enforcement: The Case of Small Businesses. Environmental Policy and Guidance. Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 422–436. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1723.

19. Park Y.S., Lee H.S. (2023). The Roles of Finance in ESG Management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies. Vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 354–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12436.

20. Preuss L. (2007). Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 354–365. DOI: 10.1002/bse.578.

21. Rating ESG… (2023). Caraveo Gomez Llanos A.F. et al. Rating ESG key performance indicators in the airline industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability. P. 1–25. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-02303775-z.

22. Suttipun M. (2023). ESG Performance and Corporate Financial Risk of the Alternative Capital Market in Thailand. Cogent Business & Management. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2168290.

23. Wang W., Yu Y., Li X. (2022). ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674.


Review

For citations:


Gabrielov V.A. The Impact of International Environmental Standards on Corporate Financial Performance: An Economic and Legal Analysis. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(6):74–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.06.05

Views: 25


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)