The Civilizational Approach and the Study of Civilizations in Library and Scientometric Analysis
Abstract
The article presents the possibilities of library and scientometric analysis in determining the structure, thematic coverage, leading scientific institutions and educational organizations, authors and editorial teams of the scientific field of the study of civilizations and the methodology of the civilizational approach. The contribution of Russian authors in the development of this approach and especially the staff of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in particular the Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, is clarified. A comprehensive study of a particular subject area is carried out on the basis of the eLibrary Scientific Electronic Library toolkit. In the article considerable attention is paid to a new type of search using artificial intelligence (“neuropoisk”), identifying its advantages and disadvantages, as well as defining the subject area of the “civilizational approach” using the keyword search. The importance of publications on library science, bibliography and book studies in the development of this topic is analyzed, the prospects for the use of library and sciento- metric analysis are determined.
About the Author
S. V. Sokolov
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences RAS (INION RAN)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei V. SOKOLOV, Researcher and the Head Research Department of Library & Information Science of the Fundamental Library
Nakhimovsky Avenue, 51/21, Moscow, 117418
References
1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A., Berezina T.N. (2001). Personal Time and Life Time. Moscow: Aletheia Publishing House. 304 pp. (in Russian).
2. Akhromeeva T.S., Malinetskiy G.G., Posashkov S.A. (2017). Culture. Self-organization. Modeling. Observatoriya kul'tury. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 260-267 (inRussian). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-3-260-267.
3. Alekseev S.S. (1995). Theory of Law: Textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: WEK, 320 pp. (in Russian).
4. Beck W. (2000). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Moscow: Progress-Tradi-tion, 384 pp. (in Russian).
5. Bezgodov D.N., Vologin E.A., Shilova S.V. (2018). Philosophy as a basic discipline for technical areas of bachelor's and specialist's degrees. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 135-143 (in Russian).
6. Blizhniy... (2023). Avatkov V.A. et al. Middle and Post-Soviet East: 2022. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 158 pp. (in Russian).
7. Categories. (2023). Galiakberova A.A. et al. Categories and methods of civilizational approach in modern philosophical and historical discourse. Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 12, no. 61, pp. 202-211.
8. Chumakov A.N. (2018). Cultural and civilizational studies: their role and value in the global world. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 27: Globalistika i geopolitika. No. 1, pp. 30-44 (in Russian).
9. Danilov-Danilyan V.I., Losev K.S. (2000). Environmental Challenge and Sustainable Development. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 416 pp. (in Russian).
10. Dvoryadkina E.B., Sbrodova N.V. (2008). Industry as a system-forming factor in the development of the region. Izves-tiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. No. 3 (22), pp. 8-13.
11. Elementarniye. (2003). Chervonyuk V.I. (ed.). Elementary Principles of the General Theory of Law. Moscow: Pravo i zakon, KolosS, 544 pp. (in Russian).
12. Gadzhiev K.S. (2017). New “Great Transformation”? Voprosy filosofii. No. 7, pp. 75-86 (in Russian).
13. Galskova N.D., Gez N.I. (2006). The Theory of Teaching Foreign Languages. Lingvodidactics and Methodology. 3rd ed. Moscow: Academia, 336 pp. (in Russian).
14. Goncharov V.N., Averkina Yu.S., Berkovskiy V.A. (2019). Social and cultural relations in society: methodological aspects of the study. Gumanitarnyye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye nauki. No. 1 (104), pp. 9-13 (in Russian).
15. Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E. (2010). Youth of Russia: A Sociological Portrait. Institute of Sociology RAS. 2nd ed. Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS, 592 pp. (in Russian).
16. Huntington S. (1994). The Clash of Civilizations? Polis (Russian Federation). No. 1, pp. 33-48.
17. Huntington S.P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 368 pp.
18. Huntington S. (2003). Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: AST, 608 pp. (in Russian).
19. Ilyin V.I. (2017). The structure of the historical track of Russia: problems of methodology. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 30-50 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2017-26-4-30-50.
20. Inglehart R., Welzel K. (2011). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: New publishing house, 464 pp. (in Russian).
21. Inozemtsev V.L., Kuznetsova E.S. (2001). Global conflict of the 21st century. Reflections on the origins and prospects of intercivilizational contradictions. Polis (Russian Federation). No. 6, pp. 131-139 (in Russian).
22. Kemerov V.E. (2011). Humanitarian and social: from opposition to synthesis. Chelovek. No. 1, pp. 5-19 (in Russian).
23. Kemerov V.E. (2014). The keys to modernity lie in shifts in methodology. Voprosy filosofii. No. 2, pp. 3-13 (in Russian).
24. Kemerov V.E. (2018). A crisis that is always with you. Voprosy filosofii. No. 6, pp. 89-98 (in Russian).
25. Khudaykulova A.V. (2020). Geopolitical triangles in the context of competition between traditional and rising centers of power. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 53-73 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-4-3.
26. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. (2019). Towards self-determination of Russian society: in search of a coordinate system. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 6-24 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-2-6-24.
27. Luhmann N. (2004). Society as a social system. Volume 1. Moscow: LLC Publishing Group “Logos”, 232 pp. (in Russian).
28. Maksimova E.Yu. (2014). Social and philosophical methods of studying tradition. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. No. 4, pp. 29-33 (in Russian).
29. Malinetsky G.G. (2021). Culture, humanitarian knowledge and the theory of self-organization. Observatoriya kul'tury. Vol.18, no. 4, pp.340-351 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-4-340-351.
30. Maslova V.A. (2004). Linguoculturology: A Textbook for University Students. 2nd ed. Moscow: Academia, 208 pp. (in Russian).
31. Novikov A.M. (2000). Russian Education in a New Era: Paradoxes of Heritage, Vectors of Development. Moscow: Egves, 272 pp. (in Russian).
32. Nureyev R.M. (2010). Comparison of economic systems over time: civilizational approaches to analysis. Terra Economicus. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 138-153 (in Russian).
33. Pantin V.I. (2012). Study of the prospects of world political development: problems of methodological synthesis. Polis (Russian Federation). No. 6, pp. 27-40 (in Russian).
34. Pavlenko V.B., Shtol V.V. (2013a). Project “Globalization”: role and place in the world-historical process. Obozrevatel'. No. 4 (279), pp. 6-26 (in Russian).
35. Pavlenko V.B., Shtol V.V. (2013b). Project “Globalization”: role and place in the world-historical process (second part). Obozrevatel'. No. 5 (280), pp. 5-28 (in Russian).
36. Pelevin S.I. (2019). Modern society in the context of technological processes: socio-philosophical analysis. Kant. No. 1 (30), pp. 213-217 (in Russian).
37. Prigogine I. (1991). Philosophy of instability. Voprosy filosofii. No. 6, pp. 46-52 (in Russian).
38. Shevchenko V.N. (2016). The civilizational approach is under fire. Voprosy filosofii. No. 2, pp. 33-44 (in Russian).
39. Shevchenko V.N. (2019). Ontological constants of Russia as a state-civilization in the context of world history. Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 29-47 (in Russian).
40. Sledzevsky I.V. (2020). The civilizational dimension of modern world development: problems and approaches. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 82-90 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-82-90.
41. Sokolov A.V. (2002). General Theory of Social Communication. St. Petersburg: Publishing house Mikhailov V.A., 461 pp. (in Russian).
42. Sokolov S.V. (2023). Social Sciences Abroad. Library Science in Interdisciplinary Discourse: Electronic Reference Book. Moscow: INION RAN, 415 pp. (in Russian).
43. Sorokin P.A. (1992). Man. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat, 543 pp. (in Russian).
44. Stepin V.S. (2000). Theoretical Knowledge: Structure, Historical Evolution. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 743 pp. (in Russian).
45. Toffler A. (1988). The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow and Company, 552 pp.
46. Toffler A. (1999). The Third Wave. Moscow: AST Publisher, 784 pp. (in Russian).
47. Torkunov A.V. (2018). A great Eurasian power in a tide of change. Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy. No. 1 (52), pp. 6-13 (in Russian).
48. Toynbee A. (1988). A Study of History. Volume II: Abridgement of Volumes VII-X. S. l.: Oxford University Press, 432 pp.
49. Toynbee A. (1991). A Study of History: Collection. Moscow: Progress, 730 pp. (in Russian).
50. Yakovlev A. (2011). The dialectic of the material and the spiritual. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye znaniya. No. 1, pp. 68-84 (in Russian).
51. Yakovlev A.I. (2013). Principles of socio-economic integration. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye znaniya. No. 4, pp. 220-225 (in Russian).
52. Yakovlev A.I. (2018). The civilizational dimension of world politics: problems and opportunities. Outlines of Global Transfor-mations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 6-29 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Sokolov S.V. The Civilizational Approach and the Study of Civilizations in Library and Scientometric Analysis. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(4):136–154. (In Russ.)
Views:
176
Email this article 