Economic and Geographical Genesis of Poverty in Tajikistan: Potential for Economic Growth While Maintaining Social Disparities

The problem of poverty in Tajikistan, despite attempts to solve it, remains relevant today. Progress in this matter is certainly noticeable, but the decisions made in terms of social policy are of questionable effectiveness and are aimed more at reducing the level of poverty on paper than at identifying and eliminating its causes. In this regard, it is extremely important to determine the real reasons for the persistence of poverty in the country, to understand whether it is systemic and what is the influence of the geographical factor on it. Based on this, the purpose of the study is to analyze the reasons for the persistence of poverty and prove the hypothesis that the key factors in the persistence of poverty are social disparities and the economic and geographical position of the country. To achieve this goal, a number of tasks have been solved, in particular, it has been proven that economic growth in the country does not affect the level of poverty, the following main factors for the persistence of poverty have been identified: economic inequality, low quality of education and lack of qualified specialists in the domestic market, population growth, low share industrial sector in the economy, high dependence on labor exports and the dynamics of development of the main market for this export, i.e. Russia. In addition, it was revealed that Tajikistan is characterized by a peripheral economic and geographical location and factors exogenous to its economy cannot have a serious impact on poverty. Based on the results obtained in the process of solving problems, recommendations have been developed for changing the objectives of the country’s economic development from achieving economic growth to social development.

1. Abduvaliev M., Bustillo R. (2020). Patterns of Official Development Assistance in Tajikistan: Effects on Growth and Po- verty Reduction. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 1–25.

2. Addae-Korankye A. (2019). Theories of Poverty: A Critical Review. Journal of Po- verty, Investment and Development. Vol. 48, pp. 55–62. DOI: 10.7176/JPID/48-08.

3. Alkire S., Santos M.E. (2010). Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries. OPHI Wor- king Papers. University of Oxford. No. 38. Available at: https://ophi.org.uk/wp-38/, accessed 05.01.2024.

4. Amponsah M., Agbola F.W., Mahmood A. (2023). The relationship between poverty, income inequality and inclusive growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Econo- mic Modelling. Vol. 126, September. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106415.

5. Arzhaev F.I., Andriukhin V.Y., Saprynskaya D.V. (2022). Systemic Poverty Modelling: Case of Central Asia. MGIMO Review of International Relations. Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 86–111 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-86-111.

6. Bedrina E.B., Faizova A.R. (2019). Migration to Russia as a way to solve the problem of poverty in Tajikistan. Human Progress. Vol. 5, issue 6, pp. 1–10 (in Russian).

7. Bird K., McKay A., Shinyekwa I. (2010). Isolation and poverty: the relationship between spatially differentiated access to goods and services and poverty. ODI. Available at: https://odi.org/en/publications/isolation-and-poverty-the-relationship-between-spatially-differentiated-access-to-goods-and-services-and-poverty/, accessed 05.01.2024.

8. Carter M.R., Barrett Ch.B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 178–199. DOI: 10.1080/00220380500405261.

9. Combes P.-Ph., Mayer Th., Thisse J.-F. (2008). Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 424 pp.

10. Dyachkov A.S. (2015). The geographical position of the Central Asian countries as the basis for the formation of the political and economic space of the region. Security Problems of the Russian Society. No. 2, pp. 151–155 (in Russian).

11. Erlando A., Riyanto F.D., Masakazu S. (2020). Financial inclusion, economic growth, and poverty alleviation: evidence from eastern Indonesia. Heliyon. Vol. 6, no. 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05235.

12. Heathershaw J. (2011). Tajikistan amidst globalization: State failure or state transformation? Central Asian Survey. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 147–168. DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2011.554070.

13. Komilov S.J., Gafarov F.M. (2017). The role of free economic zones in the deve- lopment of the investment potential of the region (on the example of the Republic of Tajikistan). Problems of Modern Econo- mics. No. 3 (63), pp. 194–197 (in Russian).

14. Kovacevic M., Calderon C. (2014). UNDP’s Multidimensional Poverty Index: Methodology Paper. New York: UNDP, 31 pp. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/specificationsforcomputationofthempi.pdf, accessed 05.01.2024.

15. Mazziotta M., Pareto A. (2023). Weighting in composite indices construction: the case of the Mazziotta-Pareto index. Rivi- sta Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica. Vol. 76, pp. 17–26. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/12/Rivista2013_Mazziotta_Pareto.pdf, accessed 05.01.2024.

16. McKnight A. (2019). Understanding the relationship between poverty, ine- quality and growth: a review of existing evidence. CASE Paper. No. 216, pp. 1–30. Available at: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper216.pdf, accessed 05.01.2024.

17. Mdingi Kh., Ho S.-Y. (2021). Literature review on income inequality and economic growth. MethodsX. Vol. 8, article no. 101402. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101402.

18. Nasirova U.N. (2020). The problem of poverty and ways to overcome it in Tajikistan in a market economy. Issues of Science and Education. No. 13 (97), pp. 21–25 (in Russian).

19. Natsional’niye strategii… (2023). Arzhaev F.I. et al. National strategies of Central Asian countries as a tool for ensuring social stability: a poverty factor. International Affairs. No. 5, pp. 58–69 (in Russian).

20. Nazarshoeva S.F. (2019). The Civil war in the Republic of Tajikistan and its impact on migration processes. Izvestiya AltGU. No. 6 (110), pp. 81–85 (in Russian).

21. Ngubane M.Z., Mndebele S., Kaseeram I. (2023). Economic growth, une- mployment and poverty: Linear and non-linear evidence from South Africa. Heliyon. Vol. 9, no. 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20267.

22. Oshio T., Kan M. (2014). Multidimensional poverty and health: evidence from a nationwide survey in Japan. International Journal for Equity in Health. Vol. 13, article no. 128. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-014-0128-9.

23. Pritchin S. (2022). “The Big Game 2.0” in Central Asia at the present stage. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 112–123 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-6-112-123.

24. Purnomo S.D., Istiqomah I. (2019). Economic Growth and Poverty: The Mediating Effect of Employment. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 238–252. DOI: 10.15294/jejak.v12i1.18591.

25. Rakhmonov A.Kh. (2022). New sanctions of the European Union and United States against Russia and their impact on Tajikistan’s socio-economic development. Management (Upravleniye). No. 4, pp. 121–131. DOI: 10.26425/2309-36332022-10-4-121-131.

26. Rakhmonov A.Kh., Ledeneva V.Yu., Akramov Sh.Yu. (2023). Contribution of Tajik labor migrants to the economy of OECD countries and Tajikistan. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics. No. 2, pp. 35–47. DOI: 1018384/2310-6646-2023-2-35-47.

27. Settle A.C. (2012). The New Development Paradigm Through the Lens of the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme: Legitimacy, Accountability and the Political Sphere. Community Development Journal. Vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 386–404. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsq065.

28. Škare M., Pržiklas D.R. (2016). Poverty and economic growth: a review. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 156–175. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1125965.

29. Some reflections… (2018). Sapena J. et al. Some reflections on poverty eradication, true development and sustainability within CST. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.005.

30. Umarov H. (2010). Research report “Tajik labor migration in the context of the global financial crisis: causes and consequences”. Dushanbe: Representative Office of the International Organization for Migration, 56 pp. (in Russian). Available at: https://tajikistan.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl2216/files/documents/globalcrisis.pdf, accessed 05.01.2024.

31. Umarov Kh. (2020). Lack of Suitable Business Environment in Tajikistan Leads to Migration. Central Asian Bureau for Analytical Reporting. Available at: https://cabar.asia/en/kh-umarov-lack-of-suitable-business-environment-in-tajikistan-leads-to-migration, accessed 05.01.2024.

32. Walker R. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty. GSDRC Professional Development Reading Pack. No. 22, 7 pp. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a0898140f0b652dd000260/Multidimensional-Poverty_RP.pdf, accessed 05.01.2024.

33. Wang Y., Wang B. (2016). Multidimensional poverty measure and analysis: a case study from Hechi City, China. SpringerPlus. Vol. 5, article no. 642. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2192-7.

34. Yang Zhou, Yansui Liu. (2022). The geography of poverty: Review and research prospects. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 93, July, pp. 408–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.008.

35. Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L. (2016). Assessment of the potential of the economic and geographical location of the regions of Russia. Economy of Region. No. 1, pp. 117– 138 (in Russian).

36. Zhou Jun (2017). The importance of the Central Asian States in the global political system. Management Consulting. No. 3 (99), pp. 164–170 (in Russian).