Russian Studies in the US: Past Experience and Today’s Problems
Abstract
Russian Studies as an established discipline has been continuously evolving for over a century, with American socio-political and area studies thought delving into various facets of the Russian reality. This article delves into the origins of Russian Studies in the United States, its unique methodological characteristics, and offers a periodization framework authored by the writer, highlighting the developmental phases of the discipline over the past century. It is worth noting that Russian Studies is an interdisciplinary field of academic endeavor, bringing together insights from diverse areas within the social and humanities sciences. The article also addresses the challenge of delineating the subject matter of this discipline and the development of research approaches for studying Russia, particularly within the historical context of the latter half of the 20th century. There is a specific focus on nurturing the growth of academic researchers and experts that specialize in Russian Studies and Sovietology. In this regard, the article posits the idea that Soviet Studies carries practical political-ideological and political-technological significance. It has emerged as a pivotal ideological force shaping public opinion and influencing the decision-making processes of American elites during the Cold War era. The article concludes by examining the contemporary challenges and prospects facing Russian Studies. It primarily concentrates on the present state of «Russian Studies», encompassing its theoretical underpinnings, empirical research, and ideological dimensions. This assessment occurs in the context of evolving public discourse about Russia within the United States and the considerable deterioration of U. S.‑Russia relations.
About the Author
Yu. I. Nadtochey
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuriy I. NADTOCHEY, PhD (History), Senior Researcher of Europe and America Department
Nakhimovsky Avenue, 51/21, Moscow, 117418
References
1. Agger B. (1991). Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 105–31.
2. American Teaching… (1959). Black C.E., Thomson J.M. (eds.). American Teaching About Russia. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 189 pp.
3. Beyond… (1995). Orlovsky D. (ed.). Beyond Soviet Studies. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson. Center Press, 349 pp.
4. Bezborodov A.B. (2015). Modern Russia and the national security of the United States of America (based on official U.S. expert materials). In: Bezborodov A.B. (ed.). Foreign Russian Studies: Textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, pp. 397–411 (in Russian).
5. Bolshakova O.V. (2013). Beyond Barriers: American Russian Studies After the Cold War: Monograph / Ed. by Z.Yu. Metlitskaya. – Moscow: INION RAN, 238 pp. (in Russian).
6. Bonnell V., Breslauer G. (1998). Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies. Berkeley: University of California, 30 pp. Available at: https://iseees.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/1998_03-bonn.pdf, accessed 08.08.2023.
7. China Studies in North America (2021). A report on survey research by the Luce / ACLS Advisory Group. Available at: https://www.acls.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/12/China-Studies-in-North-American-Report.pdf, accessed 16.06.2023.
8. Cohen S. (1986). Scholarly Missions: Sovietology as a Vocation. In: Rethinking the Soviet Experience: Politics and History Since 1917. New York: Oxford University Press, 240 pp.
9. Engerman D.C. (2009). Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America’s Soviet Experts. New York: Oxford University Press, 459 pp.
10. Ershov K.Yu. (2006). Russian Studies in the USA: Origins, Evolution and Contemporary State. Imagines Mundi: Almanac of Modern and Contemporary History of XVI–XX century. Intellectual History. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 267–283 (in Russian).
11. Essig L. (1999). Queer in Russia: A Story of Sex, Self, and the Other. London: Duke University Press, 244 pp.
12. Etkind A. (2011). Internal Colonization: Russia’s Imperial Experience. Cambridge: Polity, 264 pp.
13. Fitzpatrick S. (2008). Revisionism in Retrospect: A Personal View. Slavic Review. Vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 682–704.
14. Greene N. (2006). Advice’s Effect: The Role of Western Advisors on Russian Privatization Policy. Honors Theses. 2335. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/2335, accessed 16.06.2023.
15. Hanson S. (2003). Sovietology, Post-Sovietology, and the Study of Postcommunist Democratization. Demokratizatsiya. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 142–149.
16. Harris C.D. (1997). Russian, Slavic, and Soviet Studies in the United States: Some Memories and Notes. Russian History. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 441–56.
17. Hough J., Fainsod M. (1979). How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 679 pp.
18. Kautsky J.H. (1998). Communism and the Comparative Study of Development. Slavic Review. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13–17.
19. Kodin E.V. (2003). Harvard Project. Moscow: ROSSPAN Publ., 208 pp. (in Russian).
20. Kuchins A. (2018). Russian Power Under Putin: Up and Down and Flatline. Russia Matters. August 22. Available at: https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/russian-power-under-putin-and-down-andflatline, accessed 16.08.2023.
21. Kuchins A., Mitchell J. (2020). The State of M.A. Russia/Eurasia Programs in the United States. Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation. CERES. Available at: https://ceres.georgetown.edu/2020/06/09/the-carnegie-report-astudy-on-ma-russia-eurasia-programs-in-the-usa/, accessed 12.08.2023.
22. Kuzio T. (2020). Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War. E-International Relations. November 17. Available at: https://www.eir.info/publication/crisis-in-russian-studies-nationalism-imperialism-racism-andwar/, accessed 07.09.2023.
23. Lankina T. (2023). Branching out or inwards? The logic of fractals in Russian studies. Post-Soviet Affairs Review. Vol. 39, issue 1–2, pp. 70–85.
24. La Lova L. (2023). Methods in Russian studies: overview of top political science, economics, and area studies journals. Post-Soviet Affairs Review. Vol. 39, issue 1–2, pp. 27–37.
25. Lapteva E.V. (2004). American Russian Studies: Stereotypes and Myths. Yekaterinburg: Ural Univ. press; Perm: Perm State Pedagogical Univ., 143 pp. (in Russian).
26. Libman A. (2023). Credibility revolution and the future of Russian studies. Post-Soviet Affairs Review. Vol. 39, issue 1–2, pp. 60–69.
27. Markwick R.D. (1996). A Discipline in Transition?: From Sovietology to ‘Transitology’. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 255–276.
28. Menkovsky V.I. (2000). Anglo-American Sovietology: History, Modernity, Academic Resources. Minsk: Ecoperspective, 160 pp. (in Russian).
29. Motyl A.J. (1989). Sovietology in One Country or Comparative Nationality Studies? Slavic Review. Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 83–88.
30. Nekrasov A.A. (2000). Origins and Evolution of Western Sovietology. Yaroslavl: Yarosl. state univ. press, 68 pp. (in Russian).
31. Petrov E.V. (1998). History of American Russian Studies: Lecture Course. St. Petersburg: Russian Customs Academy, 214 pp. (in Russian).
32. Polemics J. (1994). The Postmodernist Critique of Science: Is It Useful? Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. Vol. 110, no. 3/4, pp. 113–120.
33. Postcommunism… (2022). Anderson R.D., Hanson S.E., Roeder Ph.G. (eds.). Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 224 pp.
34. Raeff M. (1990). Russia Abroad: A Cultural History of the Russian Emigration, 1919–1939. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239 pp.
35. Richmond Y. (2005). Cultural Exchange and the Cold War: How the West Won. The Polish Review. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 355–360.
36. Rivkin-Fish M., Hartblay С. (2014). When Global LGBTQ Advocacy Became Entangled with New Cold War Sentiment: A Call for Examining Russian Queer Experience. Brown Journal of World Affairs. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 95–111.
37. Sakwa R. (1999). Postcommunist Studies: Once Again Through the Looking Glass (Darkly)? Review of International Studies. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 709–719.
38. Saradzhyan S., Abdullaev N. (2018). Measuring National Power: Is Vladimir Putin’s Russia in Decline? Russia Matters. May 4. Available at: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37363205/Measuring%20National%20Power.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y; accessed 12.08.2023.
39. Shabasova M.A. (2008). The Main Paradigms of Anglo-American Historiography of Modern Russian History (1991–2000). In: Druzin M.V. (ed.). Problems of Russian History: Sources, Historiography, Research. Collection of Scientific Articles. St. Petersburg, Kiev, Minsk: St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of History of Ukraine NAS of Ukraine; Belarusian state university, 682 pp. (in Russian).
40. Shaipov A., Shaipova Y. (2023). It’s High Time to Decolonize Western Russia Studies. Foreign Policy. February 11. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/02/11/russia-studies-war-ukraine-decolonizeimperialism-western-academics-soviet-empire-eurasia-eastern-europeuniversity/, accessed 14.08.2023.
41. Shlapentokh V. (1995). American Sovietology from 1917–1991: An Attempt at Diagnosis. Russian History. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 406–432.
42. Soviet Studies… (2016). Kurilla I.I., Zhuravleva V.I. (eds.) Soviet Studies in the United States, Amerikanistika in Russia: Mutual Representations in Academic Projects. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 306 pp.
43. Subtelny O. (1994). American Sovietology’s Great Blunder: The marginalization of the nationality issue. Nationalities Papers. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 141–155.
44. Travkina N.M, Vasil’ev. V.S. (2021). De-Americanization of the USA: Causes and Consequences. Perspectivy. Electronic Journal. No. 2/3. pp. 34–49. Available at: https://www.perspektivy.info/upload/iblock/17f/2_3_2021_0_34_49.pdf, accessed 05.08.2023 (in Russian).
45. Tucker R.C. (1967). On the Comparative Study of Communism. World Politics. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 242–57.
46. Unger A.L. (1998). On the Meaning of “Sovietology”. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17–27.
47. Volkov D.V. (2016). The Dynamic of anti-American Sentiment in Post-Soviet Russia and the Main Characteristics of Current anti-Americanism. The Russian Public Opinion Herald. No. 3–4, pp. 141–159 (in Russian).
48. Zeigler C. (2014). How We Blew It in Sochi: The LGBT Community Took a Shot at Anti-Gay Laws in Russia and Missed the Olympic-Sized Target. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 30–38.
49. Zenkevich I.V. (2016). Archibald Cary Coolidge: A Promoter of Russian Studies in the United States. Yazyk i Text. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 78–85 (in Russian).
50. Zenkevich I.V. (2017). Russian Studies in the USA in the XXI Century: The Russian Language in American Education. Vestnik TGPU. Vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 117–123 (in Russian).
51. Zweynert J. (2019). Shestidesyatniki Economics, the Idea of Convergence, and Perestroika. History of Political Economy. Vol. 51, issue S1, pp. 277–299.
Review
For citations:
Nadtochey Yu.I. Russian Studies in the US: Past Experience and Today’s Problems. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2023;16(5):72-93. (In Russ.)
Views:
142
Email this article 