Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Possible Contours of Developing International Trade in the Perimeter of Global Value Chains under the Conditions of New Reality

https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.02.03

Abstract

The transition from hyperglobalization to slowgbalization that began after the 2008 global financial crisis has increased skepticism about the future of globalization and motivation to adjust the architecture of international trade. The subsequent series of global shocks – the aggravation of the US-Chinese trade relations, the COVID-19 pandemic, the events in Ukraine in 2022-2023 – aggravated the situation, exacerbating the problem of stopping the negative consequences of the disruption of supply chains of goods and services. The purpose of the article is to clarify the contours of restructuring and outlooks for the development of cross-border trade in the context of new reality: the imposition of global shocks, increasing geopolitical uncertainty and increasing fragmentation of the world economy. The object of the study is the international trade in the perimeter of global value chains (GVCs), whose share in world trade increased from 34.93% in 1995 to 45.24% in 2007 and, after falling to 43.49% in 2020, quickly recovered and increased to 49.38% in 2022. The analysis of quantitative and structural shifts in GVC-trade was based on the methodology of structuring exports in the categories of value added by A. Borin and M. Mancini. The prospects for GVC-trade were assessed using the methods of identifying the “risk iness” of goods in the export-import turnover of S. Majune and V. Stolzenburg, the frequency of cross-border bilateral interactions of S. Liang, the agglomeration to global trade of K. Baris. The characteristics of the four main options for strengthening the resistance of GVCs in modern conditions are given – reshoring, diversification, regionalization and replication. The working hypothesis has been confirmed: all 4 considered trajectories are not mutually exclusive and none of them presupposes complete autarky of the country. The main conclusion is made, according to which the negative events in the global economy of the last decade reconfigured trade flows, accelerated the processes of regionalization of the global economy, but did not become a trigger for deglobalization.

About the Author

A. A. Maltsev
Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Andrei A. MALTSEV, Dr. Sc. (Econ.), Leading Researcher

Moscovskaya Street, 29, Ekaterinburg, 620014



References

1. ADB (2023). Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific. 54th ed. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 354 рp.

2. America is Ready… (2022). Bossche P. et al. America Is Ready for Reshoring. Are You? 2022 Reshoring index. AT Kearney. Available at: https://www.kearney.com/operations-performance-transformation/us-reshoring-index, accessed 28.01.2024.

3. Antràs P. (2020). Conceptual aspects of global value chains. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No. 9114, 34 р.

4. APEC (2012). Concepts and trends in global supply, global value and global production chains. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Policy Support Unit, 15 рp.

5. Baldwin R., Freeman R. (2021). Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers. No. 29444, 36 pp.

6. Bonneau C., Nakaa М. (2020). Vulnerability of French and European Imports. Tresor Economics. No. 274. Available at: https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Articles/2020/12/17/vulnerability-of-french-and-european-imports, accessed 28.01.2024.

7. Borin A., Mancini M. (2019). Measuring What Matters in Global Value Chains and Value-Added Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. No. 8804, 64 p.

8. Canuto O. (2022). Slowbalization, Newbalization, Not Deglobalization. Policy Centre for the New South, June 1. Available at: https://www.policycenter.ma/publications/slowbalization-newbalization-not-deglobalization, accessed 28.01.2024.

9. Characterizing… (2017). Wang Z. et al. Characterizing Global Value Chains: Production Length and Upstreamness. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers. No. 23261, 71 р.

10. Dikler J. (2021). Reshoring: An Overview, Recent Trends, and Predictions for the Future. World Economy Brief. Vol. 11, no. 35, pp. 1–10.

11. Ellram L.M. (2013). Off-Shoring, Reshoring and the Manufacturing Location Decision. Journal of Supply Chain Management. Vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 3–5.

12. European Commission (2021). Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a Stronger Single Market for Europe’s Recovery. Brussels: Commission Staff Working Document. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1884, accessed 01.02.2024.

13. Fally T. (2011). On the Fragmentation of Production in the US. University of Colorado- Boulder, 44 pp.

14. Fontagné L., Guimbard H., Orefice G. (2022). A New Dataset on Product-Le vel Trade Elasticities. ELSEVIER. Data in Brief. No. 45, pp. 1–5.

15. George K., Ramaswamy S., Rassey L. (2014). Next-Shoring: A CEO’s Guide. The McKinsey Quarterly. January, pp. 1–13.

16. Gereffi G. (2011). Global Value Chains and International Competition. Antitrust Bulletin. Vol. 56, no. 1, pр. 37–56. DOI: 10.1177/0003603X1105600104.

17. Give Credit… (2010). Koopman R. et al. Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers. No. 16426, 58 р.

18. Jiangs K. (2021). Identification of Vulnerable Canadian Imports. Government of Canada. Available at: https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/economist-economiste/analysis-analyse/id-vulnerables-canadiens-importations.aspx?lang=eng, accessed 02.02.2024.

19. Johnson R., Noguera G. (2012). Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added. Journal of International Economics. Vol. 86, nо. 2, pр. 224–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003.

20. Kondrat’ev V.B. (2015). The Global Economy as a System of Global Value Chains. Мirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 3, pp. 5–17 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-3-5-17.

21. Kondrat’ev V.B. (2019). Global Value Chains in Sectors of the Economy: General and Special. Мirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 49–58 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-49-58.

22. Koopman R., Wang Z., Wei S-J. (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. American Economic Review. Vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 459–494.

23. Korniyenko Y., Pinat M., Dew B. (2017). Assessing the Fragility of Global Trade: The Impact of Localized Supply Shocks Using Network Analysis. International Monetary Fund Working Paper. No. 2017/030, 38 р.

24. Liang S., Qu S., Xu M. (2016). Betweenness- Based Method to Identify Critical Transmission Sectors for Supply Chain Environmental Pressure Mitigation. Environmental Science & Technology. Vol. 50, pp. 1330–1337. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04855.

25. Majune S., Stolzenburg V. (2023). Mapping Potential Bottleneck Products in the World. Geneva: Global Value Chain Development Report 2023 Workshop, 7–11 November 2022. In: Global Value Chain Development Report 2023: Resilient and Sustainable GVCs in Turbulent Times. ADB, IDE-JETRO, UIBE, WTO, pp. 18–19.

26. Maltsev A.A. (2022). Global Technical and Economic Challenges of the Modern Time: Risks and Opportunities for the Industry of the Urals. Ekaterinburg: Alfa Print Publishing House, 358 pp. (in Russian).

27. Maltsev A.A. (2024). Assessment of Value Added in Foreign Trade: Modern Approaches. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. No. 1, рp. 48–64 (in Russian). DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_1_48_64. Measuring Localization… (2022).

28. Baris K. et al. Measuring Localization in the Age of Economic Globalization. ADB Economics Working Paper Series. No. 647, 31 p.

29. Nagengast A.J., Stehrer R. (2014). Collateral Imbalances in Intra-European Trade? Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value-Added Trade Balances. Discussion Papers from Deutsche Bundesbank. No. 14, pр. 1–41.

30. OECD (2014). Guidelines for Resilience Systems Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing, 39 pp.

31. Post-Pandemic Reconfiguration … (2021). Elia S. et al. Post-Pandemic Reconfiguration from Global to Domestic and Regional Value Chains: The Role of Industrial Policies. Transnational Corporations. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 67–96.

32. Reiter O., Stehrer R. (2021). Learning from Tumultuous Times: An Analysis of Vulnerable Sectors in International Trade in the Context of the Corona Health Crisis. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economics Studies. Report no. 454, 63 pр.

33. Reshoring… (2016). Backer K. et al. Reshoring: Myth or Reality? Paris: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. Working Paper no. 27, 34 pp.

34. Sidorova E.A. (2018). Russia in Global Value Chains. Мirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 62, no. 9, рр. 71–80 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-71-80.

35. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D., Malygin V.E. (2021). Global Value Chains in the Age of Uncertainty: Advantages, Vulnerabilities, and Ways for Enhancing Resilience. Baltijskij region. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 78–107 (in Russian). DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-5.

36. Subramanian A., Kessler M. (2013). The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2013. Working Paper Series No. 13–6, 66 pp.

37. UNCTAD (2020). World Investment Report 2020. International Production Beyond the Pandemic. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 248 pp.

38. United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines. Washington: US Department of Justice. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/horizontal-merger-guidelines-08192010, accessed 02.02.2024.

39. US Trade Policy … (2019). Bossche P. et al. US Trade Policy and Reshoring: The Real Impact of America’s New Trade Policies. AT Kearney, 14 pр.

40. USITC (2011). The Economic Effects of Significant U. S. Import Restraints. Special Topic: Global Supply Chains. Washington: U. S. International Trade Commission. 118 рp.

41. Varnavskiy V.G. (2018). International Trade in Value Added Categories: Methodology Issues. Мirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 5–15 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-1-5-15.

42. Varnavskiy V.G. (2019). Globalization and Structural Shifts in Global Production. Мirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 25–33 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-25-33.

43. WB (2017). Global Value Chain Development Report 2017. Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development. Washington: World Bank, 189 pp.

44. When Manufacturing … (2014). Fratocchi L. et al. When Manufacturing Moves Back: Concepts and Questions. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. Vol. 20, pp. 54–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.004.

45. WTO (2023). Global Value Chain Development Report 2023: Resilient and Sustainable GVCs in Turbulent Times. ADB, IDE-JETRO, UIBE, WTO, 325 pp.


Review

For citations:


Maltsev A.A. Possible Contours of Developing International Trade in the Perimeter of Global Value Chains under the Conditions of New Reality. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(2):54-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.02.03

Views: 291


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)