The Strategy of Information Confrontation of the Countries of the Collective West in the Arab Countries of the Middle East and North Africa

Since the middle of the 20th century, the phenomenon of information-psychological confrontation and its components have been in the focus of attention of domestic and foreign researchers. As technology develops, the information front has been growing in importance/significance superiority over the enemy in the information and psychological sphere in the conditions of modern conflict is sometimes more important than superiority on the battlefield. Currently, in the context of global tension, there is another aggravation of information confrontation in the Arab world, the participants of which are both Western and Eastern countries, including Russia. The current configuration of the conflict is significantly different from all previous ones: the bloc nature of cooperation between countries is gone (as it was the case during the Cold War), while the development of information and communication technologies has allowed each side of the conflict to have an information and psychological impact on all countries of the region at once. To build the most effective national information policy, it is necessary to study in detail the approaches of other countries, determine the main and secondary vectors of their work, and identify the mechanisms of information and psychological impact. The analysis of the information and psychological strategies of the leading Western states (the USA, Great Britain and France) showed the absence of a unified approach to the implementation of activities in the information field at the theoretical and practical levels. The current state of disunity of the countries under consideration, while maintaining the leading role of the United States as the leader of the collective West, is caused by both historical prerequisites and objective political and economic reasons. Due to the current situation, as well as in connection with the active work to counter Western propaganda by Russia, China and Iran, the information and psychological campaigns of the United States, Great Britain and France are less effective than before, which nevertheless does not mean their complete collapse.

1. Abdulai K.B. (2010). Historical and cultural links between France and the Arab world. Vestnik RUDN. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 2, pp. 82–85 (in Russian).

2. Chikaidze Ts.M. (2007). The problem of Arab unity and British policy in the Arab East in the first half of the 20th century. Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 4–3, pp. 262–267 (in Russian).

3. Clarke R.A., Knake R. (2010). Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do about It. New York: Ecco, 310 pp.

4. Dalle I. (2016). Les relations entre la France et le monde arabe. Confluences Méditerranée. No. 1 (96), pp. 13–28 (in French).

5. Denisov A.A., Denisova E.V., Khomyakov V.A. (2018). The purpose and nature of the post-industrial war. The universal classifier of war. Economic strategies. No. 8, pp. 110–119 (in Russian).

6. Evstafiev D.G. Manoilo A.V. (2021). Information impact in hybrid wars: new opportunities and the crisis of propaganda. Diplomatic Service. No. 4, pp. 318–331 (in Russian).

7. Frolov D.B. (2005). Information warfare: the evolution of forms, means and methods. Sotsiologiya vlasti. No. 5, pp. 121–142 (in Russian).

8. Grinyaev S.N. (2004). The battlefield is cyberspace. Theory, techniques, means, methods and systems of information warfare. Minsk: Harvest, 448 p. (in Russian).

9. Istoriya… (2021). Lebedeva S.N. (ed.) History of Russian foreign intelligence: Essays. Volume 6. 1966–2005. Moscow: International Relations, 264 pp. (in Russian).

10. Karpovich O.G., Manoilo A.V. (2017). Color revolutions. Theory and practice of dismantling modern political regimes. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 111 pp. (in Russian).

11. Lebedeva M. Morozov V. (2022). Turning Points of World Transformation: New Trands, Challenges and Actors. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 256 pp.

12. Mann S.R. (1992). Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought. Parameters, Autumn, pp. 54–68.

13. Manoilo A.V., Kostogryzov A.I. (2023). On probabilistic risk forecasting in information warfare. Part 1. Analysis of strategies of operations and counter-operations for mathematical modeling. Issues of cybersecurity. No. 6 (58), pp. 2–19 (in Russian).

14. Nye J. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 192 pp.

15. Panarin I.N. (2006). Information warfare and geopolitics. Moscow: Pokoleniye, 560 pp. (in Russian).

16. Pocheptsov G.G. (2015). Information wars. A new policy tool. Moscow: Algoritm, 254 pp. (in Russian).

17. Rastorguev S.P. (2001). Philosophy of information warfare. Moscow: Vuzovskaya kniga, 468 pp. (in Russian).

18. Streltsov A.A. (2010). State information policy: fundamentals of theory. Moscow: ICNMO, 112 pp. (in Russian).

19. Thomas T.L. (1997). Deterring Information Warfare: A New Strategic Challenge. Parameters. Winter, pp. 81–91.

20. Vasiliev A.M., Zherlitsyna N.A. (2019). Dynamics of state policy towards the media in the countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and political sciences. No. 2, pp. 210–221 (in Russian).

21. Voyna… (2021). Abylgaziev I.I. et. al. US war for “peace” in Syria. Moscow: Institute of Foreign Policy Research and Initiatives (in Russian).