The Accumulative Model of International Economic Integration

The paper substantiates the expediency of introducing a new concept into scientific and practical circulation – cumulative economic integration. Based on the analysis of works on the theory of international economic integration, it is shown that the classical methodology, based primarily on the principles of the theory of B. Balassa, is only partially suitable for studying various forms of integration that are developing in the global economy at the present stage. In this regard, it is expedient to use the accumulative integration model, which takes into account the entire range of ties leading to the economic convergence of a group of interested states. A feature of accumulative integration is the readiness of the participants for multilateral or bilateral cooperation to achieve specific goals and the provision of privileges or special rights to each other within the framework of such agreements. The accumulative integration strategy expands the field for the development of mutual cooperation in terms of in volving countries with different levels of economic development, as well as areas of interaction. The accumulative integration can have various models, and accumulative integration itself in the future can either move to higher stages of international integration, or remain a compromise form of developing stable mutual ties for a long time to come. The conclusions drawn are supported by the analysis of concrete examples of the development of accumulative integration within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative, APEC and BRICS. Some interstate associations that can use the strategy of accumulative integration are named.

1. Balassa B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 152 pp.

2. Balassa B. (1976). Types of Economic Integration. In: Machlup F. (ed). Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sectoral. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–40.

3. Baykov A.A. (2017). Economic Regionalism as a Planetary Phenomenon. Theory and Methodology of Comparison. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 38– 53 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-4-38-53.

4. Butorina O.V., Borko Y.A. (2022). Benefits of Regional Integration: Redefining the Concept. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 92, suppl. 2, pp. S105– S112. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331622080020.

5. Grimwade N. (2017). Theory of Economic Integration: A Review. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2869-1.

6. Hosny A. (2013). Theories of Economic Integration: A Survey of the Economic and Political Literature. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences. Vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 133–155.

7. Kheyfets B.A. (2019). New economic mega-partnerships and Russia. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 288 pр. (in Russian).

8. Krapohl S. (2020). Games regional actors play: dependency, regionalism, and integration theory for the Global South. Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 840–870.

9. Lawrence R.Z. (1996). Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Overview. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 158 pp.

10. Libman A.M., Kheyfets B.A. (2011). Models of regional integration. Moscow: Ekonomika, 33 pр. (in Russian).

11. Lipsey R. (1960). The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey. The Economic Journal. Vol. 70, no. 279, pp. 496–513.

12. Mattoo A., Rocha N., Ruta M. (2020). The Evolution of Deep Trade Agreements. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No. 9283, 45 pp.

13. Meade J.E. (1955). Trade and Welfare (The Theory of International Economic Policy, Vol. 2). London: Oxford University Press, 838 pp.

14. Nedopil Ch. (2022).Brief: China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report H1 2022. Shanghai: Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University, 29 pp. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23455.84645.

15. New Development Bank (2022). Expanding Our Reach and Impact. Annual Report 2021. Shanghai, p. 4. – URL: https://www.ndb.int/annual-report-2021/pdf/NDB_AR_2021_complete.pdf, accessed 10.01.2023.

16. Shishkov Yu.V. (2001). Integration processes on the threshold of the 21st century. Why the CIS countries are not integrating. Moscow: III millennium, 480 pp. (in Russian).

17. Souza E. (2008). Economic integration in the quality ladder model. Estudos Econômicos. Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 849–887. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-41612008000400006.

18. The Emerging Markets Forum (2019). Maximizing the Positive Impacts and Minimizing the Risks of the BRI in the Central Asia and South Caucasus Region: A Policy Paper. September. – URL: https://www.emergingmarketsforum.org/policy-paper-maximizing-the-positive-impacts-and-minimizing-the-risks-of-the-bri/, accessed 10.01.2023.

19. Tinbergen J. (1954). International Economic Integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 191 pр.

20. Ushkalova D. Modern approaches to identifying models of economic integration. Bulletin of the IE RAS. No. 3, pp. 158– 170 (in Russian).

21. Vajda I. (1971). Integration, economic union and the national state. In: Vajda I., Simai M. (eds.). Foreign Trade in a Planned Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28–44.

22. Viner J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 221 pр.