<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">centero</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-0240</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-9324</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Center for Crisis Society Studies</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-2</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">centero-717</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Политические процессы в меняющемся мире</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Political Processes in the Changing World</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Неконтролируемые территории в современном мире: теория, генезис, типы, динамика</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Uncontrolled Territories in the Contemporary World: Theory, Genesis, Types and Dynamics</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-9463</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Колосов</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kolosov</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Владимир Александрович Колосов - доктор географических наук, профессор, заведующий лабораторией геополитических исследований, заместитель директора</p><p>119017, Старомонетный пер., д. 29, Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vladimir A. Kolosov - DSc in Geography, Center for Geopolitical Studies, Deputy Director</p><p>119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kolosov@igras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-5666</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Себенцов</surname><given-names>А. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sebentsov</surname><given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Александр Борисович Себенцов - кандидат географических наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории геополитических исследований</p><p>119017, Старомонетный пер., д. 29, Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexander B. Sebentsov - PhD in Geography, Senior Researcher, Center for Geopolitical Studies</p><p>119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">asebentsov@igras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-4985</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Туров</surname><given-names>Н. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Turov</surname><given-names>N. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Никита Леонидович Туров - младший научный сотрудник лаборатории геополитических исследований</p><p>119017, Старомонетный пер., д. 29, Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nikita L. Turov - Junior Researcher, Center for Geopolitical Studies</p><p>119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">turov@igras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт географии РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Science</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>01</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Сепаратизм, сецессионизм и государственные границы</issue-title><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Колосов В.А., Себенцов А.Б., Туров Н.Л., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Колосов В.А., Себенцов А.Б., Туров Н.Л.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kolosov V.A., Sebentsov A.B., Turov N.L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/717">https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/717</self-uri><abstract><p>Неконтролируемые территории (НТ) привлекают внимание все большего числа исследователей. Однако большинство публикаций посвящено лишь одному из типов НТ – непризнанным государствам. Цель работы – оценить и проанализировать изменения площади и населения всех НТ в разных макрорегионах мира в 2006– 2010 и 2014–2019 гг. Условно выделены и охарактеризованы пять направлений исследования таких территорий. Авторы различают несколько видов и территориальных рисунков контроля над территорией, предлагают типологию НТ и подробно рассматривают методику и трудности создания базы данных о них. Обострение геополитической обстановки во втором десятилетии XXI в. привело к росту числа международных конфликтов, увеличению площади и численности населения НТ в Азии, Африке и Европе. Фактическая сецессия в наибольшей степени затронула обширные зоны проблемной государственности в Азии и Африке, в которых, по оценке авторов, проживало соответственно около 45 млн и 138 млн человек. Возникновение НТ представляет собой частный случай фрагментации политического пространства на разных территориальных уровнях – следствие турбулентной трансформации мирового геополитического порядка.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The uncontrolled territories (UT) attract the attention of an increasing number of researchers; however, most publications are devoted to only one type of UTs – unrecognized states. The objective of this paper is to assess and analyze changes in territory and population of all UTs in different macro-regions of the world through 2006–2010 and 2014–2019. Five main directions of studies of such territories are identified and characterized. The authors distinguish several types and patterns of territorial control, propose a typology of UTs and consider in detail the methodology and difficulties of creating a corresponding database. The aggravation of the geopolit ical situation in the second decade of the 21th century led to an increase in the number of international conflicts and in the area and population of UTs in Asia, Africa and Europe. The de facto secession largely affected the vast zones of problematic statehood in Asia and Africa, where according to the authors’ estimates, about 45 million and 138 million people live, respectively. The emergence of UTs is a special case of the fragmentation of the political space at different territorial levels – a consequence of the turbulent transformation of the world geopolitical order.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>неконтролируемые территории</kwd><kwd>непризнанные государства</kwd><kwd>фрагментация политического пространства</kwd><kwd>сепаратизм</kwd><kwd>сецессионизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>non-controlled territories</kwd><kwd>non-recognized states</kwd><kwd>fragmentation of political space</kwd><kwd>separatism</kwd><kwd>secessionism</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в рамках проекта Российского научного фонда «Постсоветские непризнанные государства: факторы жизнеспособности и риски для России» № 19-17-00232.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was carried out at the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences as part of the work on the RSF project no 19-17- 00232 «Post-Soviet Non-Recognized States: Factors of Viability and Risks for Russia»</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алов И.Н. (2020) Пространственная концентрация афроамериканского населения в крупных городских агломерациях США // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. № 5. С. 694–703. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556620050040</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agnew J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty, Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Большаков А.Г. (2007) Непризнанные государства европейской периферии и пограничья // Международные процессы. № 3(15). С. 83–88 // http://intertrends.ru/old/fifteen/008.htm, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alov I. (2020) Spatial Concentration of African Americans in Large Metropolitan Areas of the United States. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, no 5, pp. 694–703 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556620050040</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бражалович Ф.Л. (2018) География наркотрафика в Латинской Америке // Латинская Америка. № 8. С. 32–47. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000444-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Appadurai A. (1996) Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bakke K., Linke A., O’Loughlin J.,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голубчик М.М. (1998) Политическая география мира. Смоленск: Изд. Смол. гум. ун-та.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toal G. (2018) Dynamics of State-building after War: External-internal Relations in Eurasian De Facto States. Political Geography, vol. 63, pp. 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.011</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Добронравин Н. (2011) Непризнанные государства в «серой зоне» мировой политики: основы выживания и правила суверенизации. СПБ.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barlow E. (2020) Secession in the Posttruth, Post-order World: A View from Africa. Perspectives on Secession: Theory and Case Studies (eds. Riegl M., Doboš B.), Springer International Publishing, pp. 31–44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Заяц Д.В. (2020) Феномен непризнанных государств в современном мире // Географическая среда и живые системы. № 1. С. 53–69. DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2020-1-53-69</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berg E. (2018) Bridging the Divide between Parent States and Secessionist Entities: A New Perspective for Conflict Management? Space and Polity, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2018.1457341</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин М.В. (2008) Возможна ли универсальная типология государств? // Политическая наука. № 4. С. 8–41 // https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_11838485_68205239.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berg E., Kuusk E. (2010) What Makes Sovereignty a Relative Concept? Empirical Approaches to International Society. Political Geography, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 40–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин М.В. (2011) Альтернативные формы современной государственности // Сравнительная политика.№ 2.С.11–19. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-3(5)-11-19</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berg E., Vits K. (2018) Quest for Survival and Recognition: Insights into the Foreign Policy Endeavours of the Post-Soviet De Facto States. Ethnopolitics, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 390–407. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2018.1495359</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин М.В., Мелешкина Е.Ю., Мельвиль А.Ю. (2010) Формирование новых государств: внешние и внутренние факторы консолидации // Полис. № 3. С. 26–39 // https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2010/3/3.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. (2012) Dynamics of De Facto Statehood: The South Caucasian De Facto States between Secession and Sovereignty. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 12, no 2, pp. 281– 298. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2012.686013</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иноземцев В.Л. (2008) Современная глобализация и ее восприятие в мире // Век глобализации. № 1. С. 31– 44 // https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15142807_68673531.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolshakov A. (2007) Non-Recognized States in European Borderlands. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no 3(15), pp. 83– 88. Available at: http://intertrends.ru/old/fifteen/008.htm, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колосов В.А., Мироненко Н.С. (2001) Геополитика и политическая география. М.: Аспект Пресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brazhalovich F. (2018) The Geography of Drug Trafficking in Latin America. Latinskaya America, no 8, pp. 32–47 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000444-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркедонов С.М. (2012) Де-факто государства постсоветского пространства. Ереван: Институт Кавказа.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brazhalovich F., Klyuchnikov M., Lukyanov A. (2016) The Political-geographical Aspects of Problematic Statehood (Exemplified by Somalia). Geography and Natural Resources, vol. 37, no 3, pp. 264–270. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372816030100</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мироненко Н.С., Денисенцев А.С. (2004) О политической геоконфликтологии как области географического знания // Мироненко Н.С. (ред.) Проблемы геоконфликтологии в 2 т. М.: Пресс-Соло. Т. 1. С. 12–24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carboni A., Moody J. (2018) Between the Cracks: Actor Fragmentation and Local Conflict Systems in the Libyan Civil War. Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, vol. 29, no 3, pp. 456–490. DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2018.1455318</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Неклесса А.И. (1997) Постсовременный мир в новой системе координат // Восток. № 2. С. 35–50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caspersen N. (2012) Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, MA: Polity.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Политический атлас современности: Опыт многомерного статистического анализа политических систем современных государств (2007). М.: МГИМО-Университет.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dembinska M. (2018) Carving out the Nation with the Enemy’s Kin: Double Strategy of Boundary-making in Transnistria and Abkhazia. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 25, no 1, pp. 298–317. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12386</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Ф.А. (2011) От «безгосударственной территории» к «государству де-факто» // Международные процессы. Т. 9. № 2(26). С. 16–28 // https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17006286_75413644.pdf, дата обращения 16.12.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dembinska M., Campana A. (2017) Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research. International Studies Review, vol. 19, no 2, pp. 254–278. DOI: 10.1093/isr/vix010</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Ф.А. (2012) География сецессионизма в современном мире. М.: Новый Хронограф.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobronravin N. (2011) Unrecognized States in the “Gray Zone” of World Politics: The Basics of Survival and Sovereignty Rules, Saint Petersburg: Publishing of the European University in Saint Petersburg (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Ф.А. (2014) Пространственные аспекты деградации и краха суверенного государства // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 7. С. 78–86 // https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21787369_93818490.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ekeke A., Lubisi N. (2019) Secession in Africa: An African Union Dilemma. African Security Review, vol. 28, no 3–4, pp. 245–260. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2020.1717974</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Себенцов А.Б., Колосов В.А. (2012) Феномен неконтролируемых территорий в современном мире // Полис. № 2. С. 31–46 // https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2012/2/3.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elden S. (2007) Rethinking Governmentality. Political Geography, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 29–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сергунин А.А. (2010) Суверенитет: эволюция концепта // Политическая экспертиза. Политэкс. № 4. С. 5–21 // https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_16352861_69316232.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fernandez-Molina I., Ojeda-Garcia R. (2020) Western Sahara as a Hybrid of a Parastate and a State-in-Exile: (Extra)territoriality and the Small Print of Sovereignty in a Context of Frozen Conflict. Nationalities Papers, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 83–99. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2019.34</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Силаева З.В., Большаков А.Г. (2012) Феномен «спорных государств» в современной мировой политике: субъект влияния или инструмент глобальной игры // Политическая экспертиза. Политэкс. № 3. С. 221–242 // https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20800345_54854104.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florea A. (2014) De Facto States in International Politics (1945–2011): A New Data Set. International Interactions, vol. 40, no 5, pp. 788–811. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2014.915543</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Туровский Р.Ф. (1999) Политическая география. Смоленск: Издательство СГУ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucher M. (1991) Fronts et frontières: un tour de monde géopolitique, Paris: Fayard.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Agnew J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty, Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Appadurai A. (1996) Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bakke K., Linke A., O’Loughlin J.,</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glassner M., De Blij H. (1989) Systematic Political Geography, 4th ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Toal G. (2018) Dynamics of State-building after War: External-internal Relations in Eurasian De Facto States // Political Geography, vol. 63, pp. 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.011</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golubchik M. (1998) Political Geography of the World, Smolensk: Izd. Smol. gum. u-ta (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barlow E. (2020) Secession in the Posttruth, Post-order World: A View from Africa // Perspectives on Secession: Theory and Case Studies (eds. Riegl M., Doboš B.), Springer International Publishing, pp. 31– 44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hettne B., Söderbaum F. (1998) The New Regionalism Approach. Politeia, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 6–21. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?-abstract_id=2399180, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berg E. (2018) Bridging the Divide between Parent States and Secessionist Entities: A New Perspective for Conflict Management? // Space and Polity, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2018.1457341</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoch T. (2018) Legitimization of Statehood and its Impact on Foreign Policy in De Facto States: A Case Study of Abkhazia. Iran and the Caucasus, vol.22, no 4, pp.382–402. DOI: 10.1163/1573384X-20180406</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berg E., Kuusk E. (2010) What Makes Sovereignty a Relative Concept? Empirical Approaches to International Society // Political Geography, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 40–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holmes J. (2015) Sendero Luminoso after Fujimori: A Sub-national Analysis. The Latin Americanist, vol. 59, no 2, pp. 29–50. DOI: 10.1111/tla.12053</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berg E., Vits K. (2018) Quest for Survival and Recognition: Insights into the Foreign Policy Endeavours of the Post-Soviet De Facto States // Ethnopolitics, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 390–407. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2018.1495359</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilyin M.(2008) Can There Be a Universal Typology of States? Political Science, no 4, pp. 8–41. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_11838485_68205239.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. (2012) Dynamics of De Facto Statehood: The South Caucasian De Facto States between Secession and Sovereignty // Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 12, no 2, pp. 281– 298. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2012.686013</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilyin M. (2011) Alternative Forms of Modern Statehood. Comparative Politics Russia, no 2, pp. 11–19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-3(5)-11-19</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brazhalovich F., Klyuchnikov M., Lukyanov A. (2016) The Political-geographical Aspects of Problematic Statehood (Exemplified by Somalia) // Geography and Natural Resources, vol. 37, no 3, pp. 264–270. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372816030100</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilyin M., Meleshkina Ye., Melvil A. (2010) Formation of New States: External and Internal Factors of Consolidation. Polis, no 3, pp. 26–39. Available at: https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2010/3/3.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carboni A., Moody J. (2018) Between the Cracks: Actor Fragmentation and Local Conflict Systems in the Libyan Civil War // Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, vol. 29, no 3, pp. 456–490. DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2018.1455318</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Inozemtsev V. (2008) Modern Globalization and Its Perception in the World. Age of Globalization, no 1, pp. 31–44. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15142807_68673531.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caspersen N. (2012) Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, MA: Polity.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jackson R.H. (2007) Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World. International Law and International Relations (eds. Simmons B., Steinberg R.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–232.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dembinska M. (2018) Carving out the Nation with the Enemy’s Kin: Double Strategy of Boundary-making in Transnistria and Abkhazia // Nations and Nationalism, vol. 25, no 1, pp. 298–317. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12386</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joffe G. (2020) Libya: The New Geopolitical Arena. The Journal of North African Studies, vol. 25, no 5, pp. 681–688. DOI: 10.1080/13629387.2020.1790110</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dembinska M., Campana A. (2017) Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research // International Studies Review, vol. 19, no 2, pp. 254–278. DOI: 10.1093/isr/vix010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jones M., Jones R. (2004) Nation States, Ideological Power and Globalisation: Can Geographers Catch the Boat? Geoforum, vol. 35, no 4, pp. 409–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.12.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ekeke A., Lubisi N. (2019) Secession in Africa: An African Union dilemma // African Security Review, vol. 28, no 3–4, pp. 245–260. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2020.1717974</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Justin P.H., De Vries L. (2019) Governing Unclear Lines: Local Boundaries as a (Re)source of Conflict in South Sudan. Journal of Borderlands Studies,vol.34, no 1, pp.31– 46. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1294497</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elden S. (2007) Rethinking Governmentality // Political Geography, vol. 26, no 1, pp.29–33.DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalyvas S. (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Florea A. (2014) De Facto States in International Politics (1945–2011): A New Data Set // International Interactions, vol. 40, no 5, pp. 788–811. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2014.915543</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knight D.B. (1982) Identity and Territory: Geographical Perspectives on Nationalism and Regionalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 72, no 4, pp. 514–531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01842.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fernandez-Molina I., Ojeda-Garcia R. (2020) Western Sahara as a Hybrid of a Parastate and a State-in-Exile: (Extra)territoriality and the Small Print of Sovereignty in a Context of Frozen Conflict // Nationalities Papers, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 83– 99. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2019.34</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolosov V., Mironenko N. (2001) Geopolitics and Political Geography, Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foucher M. (1991) Fronts et frontières: un tour de monde géopolitique, Paris: Fayard.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolosov V., O’Loughlin J. (1999) Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR). Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity (ed. Newman D.), London: Franc Cass, pp. 151–176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolstø P. (2006) The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 43, no 6, pp. 723–740. DOI: 10.1177/0022343306068102</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glassner M., De Blij H. (1989) Systematic Political Geography, 4th ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasner S.D. (2009) Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations, London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hettne B., Söderbaum F. (1998) The New Regionalism Approach // Politeia, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 6–21 // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2399180, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P., Venables A. (1995) Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no 4, pp. 857–880. DOI: 10.2307/2946642</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoch T. (2018) Legitimization of Statehood and Its Impact on Foreign Policy in De Facto States: A Case Study of Abkhazia // Iran and the Caucasus, vol. 22, no 4, pp. 382– 402. DOI: 10.1163/1573384X-20180406</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lamb R.D. (2008) Ungoverned Areas and Threats from Safe Havens. Available at: https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default/files/2019-07/ugash_report_final.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holmes J. (2015) Sendero Luminoso after Fujimori: A Sub-national Analysis // The Latin Americanist, vol. 59, no 2, pp. 29–50. DOI: 10.1111/tla.12053</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lawler A. (2015) Making Contact. Science, vol. 348, no 6239, pp. 1072–1079. DOI: 10.1126/science.348.6239.1072</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jackson R.H. (2007) Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World. International Law and International Relations (eds. Simmons B., Steinberg R.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–232.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">MacDonald S. (1993) The New “Bad Guys”: Exploring the Parameters of the Violent New World Order. Gray Area Phenomena: Confronting the New World Disorder (ed. Manwaring M.), Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 33–60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joffe G. (2020) Libya: The New Geopolitical Arena // The Journal of North African Studies, vol. 25, no 5, pp. 681–688. DOI: 10.1080/13629387.2020.1790110</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markedonov S. (2012) De Facto States in the Post-Soviet Space, Yerevan: Institute of the Caucasus (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jones M., Jones R. (2004) Nation States, Ideological Power and Globalisation: Can Geographers Catch the Boat? // Geoforum, vol. 35, no 4, pp. 409–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.12.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McColl R.W. (1969) The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 59, no 4, pp. 613–631. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1969.tb01803.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Justin P.H., De Vries L. (2019) Governing Unclear Lines: Local Boundaries as a (Re)source of Conflict in South Sudan // Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 34, no 1, pp. 31–46. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1294497</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McGarry J. (2004) Foreword: De Facto States and the International Order. De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (eds. Bahcheli T., Bartmann B., Srebrnik H.), London: Routledge, pp. ix–xii.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kalyvas S. (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Menkhaus K. (2007) Constraints and Opportunities in Ungoverned Spaces: The Horn of Africa. Denial of Sanctuary: Understanding Terrorist Safe Havens (ed. Innes M.), CT: Praeger Security International, pp. 67–82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knight D.B. (1982) Identity and Territory: Geographical Perspectives on Nationalism and Regionalism // Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 72, no 4, pp. 514–531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01842.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mironenko N., Denisencev A. (2004) About Political Geoconflictology as a Field of Geographical Knowledge. Problems of Geoconflictology (ed. Mironenko N.), Moscow: Press-Solo, vol. 1, pp. 12–24 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kolosov V., O’Loughlin J. (1999) Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR) // Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity (ed. Newman D.), London: Franc Cass, pp. 151– 176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murphy A. (2002) National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System: Geographical Considerations. Geopolitics, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 193–214. DOI: 10.1080/714000938</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kolstø P. (2006) The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States // Journal of Peace Research, vol. 43, no 6, pp. 723–740. DOI: 10.1177/0022343306068102</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murphy A. (2010) Intersecting Geographies of Institutions and Sovereignty. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Vol. 7 (ed. Denemark R.), Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 4628–4645.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krasner S.D. (2009) Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations, London: Routledge. Krugman P., Venables A. (1995) Globalization and the Inequality of Nations // The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no 4, pp. 857–880. DOI: 10.2307/2946642</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neklessa A.I. (1997) Postmodern World in a New Coordinate System. Vostok, no 2, pp. 35–50 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lamb R.D. (2008) Ungoverned Areas and Threats from Safe Havens. Available at: https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default/files/2019-07/ugash_report_final.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Norman S. (2018) Narcotization as Security Dilemma: The FARC and Drug Trade in Colombia. Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism, vol. 41, no 8, pp. 638–659. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338052</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lawler A. (2015) Making Contact // Science, vol. 348, no 6239, pp. 1072–1079. DOI: 10.1126/science.348.6239.1072</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V. (2017) Building Identities in post-Soviet “De Facto States”: Cultural and Political Icons in Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, and Abkhazia.Eurasian Geography and Economic, vol. 58, no 17, pp. 691–715. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2018.1468793</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">MacDonald S. (1993) The New “Bad Guys”: Exploring the Parameters of the Violent New World Order // Gray Area Phenomena: Confronting the New World Disorder (ed. Manwaring M.), Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 33–60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V., Toal G. (2014) Inside the post-Soviet De Facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 55, no 5, pp. 423–456. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1012644</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McColl R.W. (1969) The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution // Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 59, no 4, pp. 613–631. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1969.tb01803.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ong A. (2000) Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia. Theory, Culture, and Society, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 55–75. DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051310</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McGarry J. (2004) Foreword: De Facto States and the International Order // De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (eds. Bahcheli T., Bartmann B., Srebrnik H.), London: Routledge, pp. ix–xii.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pegg S. (1998) De Facto States in the International System. Institute of International Relations. The University of British Columbia. Working Paper. No 21. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.695.2796&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Menkhaus K. (2007) Constraints and Opportunities in Ungoverned Spaces: The Horn of Africa // Denial of Sanctuary: Understanding Terrorist Safe Havens (ed. Innes M.), CT: Praeger Security International, pp. 67–82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Political Atlas of the Modern World: An Experiment in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of the Political Systems of Modern States (2009), Moscow: Preprint. MGIMO-University Press (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murphy A. (2002) National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System: Geographical Considerations // Geopolitics, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 193–214. DOI: 10.1080/714000938</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov F.А. (2011) From Stateless Territory to “De Facto State”. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, vol. 9, no 2(26), pp. 16–28. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17006286_75413644.pdf, accessed 16.12.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murphy A. (2010) Intersecting Geographies of Institutions and Sovereignty // The International Studies Encyclopedia. Vol. 7 (ed. Denemark R.), Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 4628–4645.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov F.A. (2012) Geography of Separatism in the Contemporary World, Moscow: Novyj Chronograf (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit63"><label>63</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Norman S. (2018) Narcotization as Security Dilemma: The FARC and Drug Trade in Colombia // Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism, vol. 41, no 8, pp. 638–659. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338052</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov F.A. (2014) Spatial Aspects of the Degradation and Collapse of a Sovereign State. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, no 7, pp. 78–86. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21787369_93818490.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit64"><label>64</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V. (2017) Building Identities in post-Soviet “De Facto States”: Cultural and Political Icons in Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, and Abkhazia // Eurasian Geography and Economic, vol. 58, no 17, pp. 691–715. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2018.1468793</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rabasa A. et al. (2007) Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks, CA: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit65"><label>65</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V., Toal G. (2014) Inside the post-Soviet De Facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria // Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 55, no 5, pp. 423–456. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1012644</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raufer X. (2000) New World Disorder, New Terrorisms: New Threats for Europe and the Western World. The Future of Terrorism (eds. Taylor M., Horgan J.), London: Frank Cass Publishers, pp. 30–51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit66"><label>66</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ong A. (2000) Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia // Theory, Culture, and Society, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 55–75. DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051310</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosenau J. (2002) The Governance of Fragmegration: Neither a World Republic nor a Global Interstate System. Available at: http://aura.u-pec.fr/regimen/_fich/_pdf/pub_002.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit67"><label>67</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pegg S. (1998) De Facto States in the International System // Institute of International Relations. The University of British Columbia. Working Paper. No 21 // https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.695.2796&amp;rep=-rep1&amp;type=pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rotberg R. (1) (2003) Failed States, Collapsed States, Weak States: Causes and Indicators. State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror (ed. Rotberg R.), Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–25.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit68"><label>68</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rabasa A. et al. (2007) Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks, CA: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rotberg R. (2) (2003) When State Fail, Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit69"><label>69</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raufer X. (2000) New World Disorder, New Terrorisms: New Threats for Europe and the Western World // The Future of Terrorism (eds. Taylor M., Horgan J.), London: Frank Cass Publishers, pp. 30–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmitt-Egner P. (2002) The Concept of ‘Region’: Theoretical and Methodological Notes on its Reconstruction. European Integration, vol. 24, no 3, pp. 25–34. DOI: 10.1080/07036330270152196</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit70"><label>70</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosenau J. (2002) The Governance of Fragmegration: Neither a World Republic nor a Global Interstate System. // http://aura.u-pec.fr/regimen/_fich/_pdf/pub_002.pdf, дата обращения 25.09.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sebentsov A., Kolosov V. (2012) The Phenomenon of Uncontrolled Territories in the Modern World. Polis, no 2, pp. 31–46. Available at: https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2012/2/3.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit71"><label>71</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rotberg R. (1) (2003) Failed States, Collapsed States, Weak States: Causes and Indicators // State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror (ed. Rotberg R.), Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sergunin A. (2010) Sovereignty: Evolution of Concept. Political Expertise: POLITEX, no 4, pp. 5–21. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_16352861_69316232.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit72"><label>72</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rotberg R. (2) (2003) When State Fail, Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidaway J. (2003) Sovereign Excesses? Portraying Postcolonial Sovereigntyscapes. Political Geography, vol. 22, no 2, pp. 157– 178.DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00082-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit73"><label>73</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmitt-Egner P. (2002) The Concept of ‘Region’: Theoretical and Methodological Notes on its Reconstruction // European Integration, vol. 24, no 3, pp. 25–34. DOI: 10.1080/07036330270152196</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silayeva Z., Bolshakov A. (2012) Phenomenon “Contested States” in Modern World Politics: An Influence of Actors or Tool of Global Games. Political Expertise: POLITEX, no 3, pp. 221–242. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20800345_54854104.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit74"><label>74</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sidaway J. (2003) Sovereign Excesses? Portraying Postcolonial Sovereigntyscapes // Political Geography, vol. 22, no 2, pp. 157– 178. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00082-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">South A. (2018) “Hybrid Governance” and the Politics of Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process. Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 50–66. DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit75"><label>75</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">South A. (2018) “Hybrid Governance” and the Politics of Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process // Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 50–66. DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Staniland A. (2012) States, Insurgents, and Wartime Political Orders. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 243–264. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592712000655</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit76"><label>76</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Staniland A. (2012) States, Insurgents, and Wartime Political Orders // Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 243–264. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592712000655</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tao R., Srtandow D., Findley M., Thill J.-C., Walsh J. (2016) A Hybrid Approach to Modeling Territorial Control in Violent Armed Conflicts. Transactions in GIS, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 413–425. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12228</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit77"><label>77</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tao R., Srtandow D., Findley M., Thill J.-C., Walsh J. (2016) A Hybrid Approach to Modeling Territorial Control in Violent Armed Conflicts // Transactions in GIS, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 413–425. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12228</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taylor P., Flint C. (2018) Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality, London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit78"><label>78</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taylor P., Flint C. (2018) Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality, London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turovskij R. (1999) Political Geography, Smolensk: Izdatel’stvo SGU (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit79"><label>79</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wallensteen P. (2002) Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System, London: Sage.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wallensteen P. (2002) Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System, London: Sage.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit80"><label>80</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whelan T. (2006) Africa’s Ungoverned Space // Nacao &amp; Defesa, vol. 114, no 3, pp. 61–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whelan T. (2006) Africa’s Ungoverned Space. Nacao &amp; Defesa, vol. 114, no 3, pp. 61–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit81"><label>81</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zayats D. (2020) The Phenomenon of Unrecognized States in the Modern World. Geographical Environment and Living Systems, no 1, pp. 53–69 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2020-1-53-69</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zayats D. (2020) The Phenomenon of Unrecognized States in the Modern World. Geographical Environment and Living Systems, no 1, pp. 53–69 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2020-1-53-69</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
