<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">centero</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-0240</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-9324</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Center for Crisis Society Studies</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-12</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">centero-626</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>В рамках дискуссии</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Under Discussion</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Концепт «разрушения правды»  в условиях цифрового общества (аналитический обзор)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Concept of the “Truth Decay” in a Digital Society (an Analytical Review)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4211-3711</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Грачев</surname><given-names>М. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Grachev</surname><given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Михаил Николаевич Грачев</p><p>доктор политических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры теоретической и прикладной политологии факультета истории, политологии и права Историко-архивного института</p><p>125993, Миусская пл., д. 6, Москва, Российская Федерация</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mikhail N. </p><p>DSc in Politics, Professor, Professor of the Department for Theoretical and Applied Political Science of the Division for History</p><p>125993, Miusskaya Sq., 6, Moscow, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">grachev.m@rggu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-7035</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Евстифеев</surname><given-names>Р. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Evstifeev</surname><given-names>R. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Роман Владимирович Евстифеев</p><p>доктор политических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник</p><p>600017, ул. Горького, д. 59а, Владимир, Российская Федерация</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Roman V. Evstifeev</p><p>DSc in Politics, Leading Researcher</p><p>600017, Gorkogo St., 59a, Vladimir, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">roman_66@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российский государственный гуманитарный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Political Science and Law of the Institute for History and Archives</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Владимирский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Vladimir Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Цифровое общество</issue-title><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>248</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Грачев М.Н., Евстифеев Р.В., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Грачев М.Н., Евстифеев Р.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Grachev M.N., Evstifeev R.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/626">https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/626</self-uri><abstract><p>Появление феномена «постправды» как доминирования эмоций и мнений над фактами, широкое распространение недостоверной информации, стремительный рост потока фейковых новостей в современном пространстве политической коммуникации выступают внешними проявлениями более сложной системы вызовов, основания которой заключаются в изменившемся характере медиасреды и способах обработки информации сознанием индивидов, которые, в свою очередь, обусловлены преобладающими политическими и экономическими отношениями. Данная система вызовов, получившая название «разрушение правды», характеризуется совокупностью четырех взаимосвязанных и взаимообусловленных тенденций, проявляющихся в современных политико-коммуникационных процессах: нарастанием противоречий между фактами и интерпретациями этих фактов; стиранием различий и границ между фактами и мнениями; усилением влияния высказываемых мнений и личных точек зрения на восприятие фактов; снижением доверия массовой аудитории к ранее считавшимся авторитетными источникам информации. Очевидно, что указанные тенденции проявлялись и ранее, однако их воздействие на общественное сознание становится особенно заметным и ощутимым с наступлением «цифровой эпохи». Есть основания полагать, что подобное воздействие в известной степени может быть обусловлено целенаправленными усилиями отдельных политических акторов, преследующих собственные интересы. Авторы анализируют недавно опубликованные результаты исследований, проведенных специалистами корпорации RAND, которые наглядно демонстрируют эрозию публичного дискурса и убедительно объясняют их с позиций концепции «разрушения правды». Данное направление исследований является новым для политической науки и пока основывается исключительно на анализе материалов, имеющих отношение к американской действительности. Однако, по мнению авторов, выводы, к которым приходят ученые из США, имеют более общий характер и представляют несомненный интерес для исследования современных процессов политической коммуникации в других странах.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The emergence of the “posttruth” phenomenon as the dominance of emotions and opinions over facts, the widespread dissemination of false information, and the rapid growth of fake news in the modern political communication space are the external manifestations of a more complex system of challenges, the basis of which lies in the changed nature of the media environment and ways of processing information by people’s minds, which, in turn, are caused by prevailing political and economic relations. This system of challenges is called “Truth Decay” and characterized by a set of four interconnected and interdependent trends in the contemporary political communication processes: the increase of the contradictions between facts and interpretations of these facts; the erasure of the differences between facts and opinions; the amplification of the opinions and personal points of view influence on the perception of facts; the drop of the mass audience confidence to the sources of information that were previously considered as authoritative. It is obvious that the indicated tendencies were appeared earlier, but their impact on the public consciousness becomes especially more significant and noticeable with the advent of the “digital era”. There is reason to consider that this indicated impact in a certain extent may be due to the premeditated efforts of some political actors pursuing their own interests. The authors are analyzed the recently published results of studies conducted by specialists of the RAND Corporation, which are clearly demonstrated the erosion of the civil discourse and con- vincingly explain it from the standpoint of the “Truth Decay” concept. This research area is innovative for the modern political science and is so far based solely on the analysis of the materials concerned to American realities. However, the authors are believed that the results reached by the scientists from the USA are more general and this conclusions can be used for the study of the modern political communication in processes other countries.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>политическая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>разрушение правды</kwd><kwd>постправда</kwd><kwd>фейковые новости</kwd><kwd>цифровая эпоха</kwd><kwd>трансформация коммуникационной среды</kwd><kwd>публичный дискурс</kwd><kwd>интерпретация фактов</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>political communication</kwd><kwd>Truth Decay</kwd><kwd>post-truth</kwd><kwd>fake news</kwd><kwd>digital age</kwd><kwd>communication environment transformation</kwd><kwd>public discourse</kwd><kwd>interpretation of facts</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бродовская Е.В. (2019) Цифровые граждане, цифровое общество и цифровая гражданственность // Власть. Т. 27. № 4. C. 65–69. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6587</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourdieu P. (1993) The Social Space and the Genesis of Classes. Bourdieu P. Sociology of Politics, Moscow: Socio-Logos, pp. 55–97 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурдье П. (1993) Социальное пространство и генезис «классов» // Бурдье П. Социология политики. М.: Socio-Logos. C. 55–97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brodovskaya E.V. (2019) Digital Citizens, Digital Society and Digital Citizenship. Vlast’, vol. 27, no 4, pp. 65–69 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6587</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Виноградов В.В. (1999) История слов. М.: Институт русского языка.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burgess A., Burgess J. (2011) Truth, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Володенков С.В. (2019) Влияние технологий интернет-коммуникаций на современные общественно-политические процессы: сценарии, вызовы и акторы // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. № 5. С. 341–364. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.16</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fedorchenko S.N. (2018) Political Hologram: A New Possibility of Communication or Phantom Menace 3D Handling a Digital Society? Bulletin of Moscow Region State University, no 2, pp. 189–203 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2018-2-896</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коньков А.Е. (2019) Цифровизация политических отношений: грани познания и механизмы транс- формации // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. Т. 12. № 6. C. 6–28. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-6-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Festinger L. (1999) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Saint Petersburg: Uventa (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Красовская Н. (2020) Жизнь в эпоху постправды // Pravda.ru. 12 февраля 2020 // https://www.pravda.ru/science/1473851-feik_seti/, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Flek L. (1999) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact: An Introduction to the Theory of Thinking Style and Thinking Group, Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual’noj knigi (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кун Т. (2001) Структура научных революций. М.: АСТ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Flood A. (2016) “Post-truth” Named Word of the Year by Oxford Dictionaries. The Guardian, November 15, 2016. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/15/post-truth-namedword-of-the-year-by-oxford-dictionaries, accessed 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лазарсфельд П. (2018) Вводная часть ко второму изданию книги «Выбор народа: как избиратель принимает решение в президентской кампании» // Социологический журнал. Т. 24. № 4. С. 154–176. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.4.6102</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Flood A. (2017) Fake News Is “Very Real” Word of the Year for 2017. The Guardian, November 2, 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/02/fake-news-is-very-real-word-of-the-year-for-2017, accessed 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липпман У. (2004) Общественное мнение. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение».</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fromm E. (1992) From the Captivity of Illusions. Fromm E. The Soul of Man, Moscow: Respublika, pp. 299–374 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мануков С. (2015) Тайна происхождения капитала Ротшильдов // Эксперт Online. 4 мая 2015 // https://expert.ru/2015/05/4/kapital-rotshildov/, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kakutani M. (2018) The Death of Truth: Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump, New York: Tim Duggan Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. (1959) К критике политической экономии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. 2е изд. Т. 13. М.: Госполитиздат. С. 1–167.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katz E. (1959) Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal. Studies in Public Communication, vol. 2, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&amp;context=asc_papers, accessed 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Платон (1994) Государство // Платон. Собр. соч.: В 4 т. Т. 3. М.: Мысль. С. 79–420.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kavanagh J., Marcellino W., Blake J.S., Smith S., Davenport S., Tebeka M.G. (2019) News in a Digital Age: Comparing the Presentation of News Information over Time and Across Media Platforms, Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попова О.В. (ред.) (2018) «Политика постправды» и популизм. СПб.: Скифия-принт.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kavanagh J., Rich M.D. (2018) Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life, Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сморгунов Л.В. (ред.) (2018) Публичная политика: институты, цифровизация, развитие. М.: Аспект Пресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirkham R.L. (1992) Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федорченко С.Н. (2018) Политическая голограмма: новая возможность коммуникации или скрытая угроза 3D манипулирования цифровым обществом? // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. № 2. С. 189–203. DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2018-2-896</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konkov A.E. (2019) Digitalization in Political Relations: Planes for Perception and Mechanisms for Transformation. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 12, no 6, pp. 6–28 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-6-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фестингер Л. (1999) Теория когнитивного диссонанса. СПб.: Ювента.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasovskaya N. (2020) Life in the Post- Truth Epoch. Pravda.ru, February 12, 2020. Available at: https://www.pravda. ru/science/1473851-feik_seti/, accessed 21.05.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флек Л. (1999) Возникновение и развитие научного факта: Введение в теорию стиля мышления и мыслительного коллектива. М.: Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P. (2011) The Post-Truth Campaign. The New York Times, December 23, 2011. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/opinion/krugmanthe-post-truth-campaign.html, accessed 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фромм Э. (1992) Из плена иллюзий // Фромм Э. Душа человека. М.: Респу- блика. С. 299–374.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuhn T. (2001) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Moscow: AST (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шестов Л. (1993) Potestas clavium (Власть ключей) // Шестов Л. Соч.: В 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Наука. С. 15–312.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Künne W. (2003) Conceptions of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эксперты РАСО: Черные лебеди кружат над нами. Публичное действие в условиях «обнуления» (2020) // КРОС. 9 апреля 2020 // https://vc.ru/marketing/119016-eksperty-raso-chernye-lebedikruzhat-nad-nami-publichnoe-deystviev-usloviyah-obnuleniya, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lasswell H.D. (1927) Propaganda Technique in the World War, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner &amp; Co, Ltd; New York: Alfred A. Knopf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burgess A., Burgess J. (2011) Truth, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lazarsfeld P.F. (2018) Preface and Introduction to the Second Edition of “The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Election Campaign”. Sociological Journal, vol. 24, no 4, pp. 154–176 (in Russian). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.4.6102</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Flood A. (2016) “Post-truth” Named Word of the Year by Oxford Dictionaries // The Guardian, November 15, 2016 // https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/15/post-truth-named-word-of-the-year-by-oxford-dictionaries, дата об- ращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lippmann W. (2004) Public Opinion, Moscow: Institut Fonda «Obshhestvennoe mnenie» (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Flood A. (2017) Fake News Is “Very Real” Word of the Year for 2017 // The Guardian, November 2, 2017 // https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/02/fake-news-is-very-real-word-of-the-yearfor-2017, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manukov S. (2015) The Secret of the Rothschild Capital Origin. Expert Online, May 4, 2015. Available at: https://expert.ru/2015/05/4/kapital-rotshildov/, accessed 21.05.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kakutani M. (2018) The Death of Truth: Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump, New York: Tim Duggan Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. (1959) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Marx K., Engels F., Works, 2nd ed., vol. 13, Moscow: Gospolitizdat, pp. 1–167 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katz E. (1959) Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal // Studies in Public Communication, vol. 2, pp. 1–6 // https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&amp;context=asc_papers, дата об- ращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mathieu-Dairnvaell G.-M. (2013) Histoire Edifiante et Curieuse de Rothschild Ier, Roi des Juifs, Paris: Hachette Livre-BnF.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kavanagh J., Marcellino W., Blake J.S., Smith S., Davenport S., Tebeka M.G. (2019) News in a Digital Age: Comparing the Presentation of News Information over Time and Across Media Platforms, Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Norris P., Inglehart R. (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Authoritarian-populism, New York: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kavanagh J., Rich M.D. (2018) Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life, Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plato (1994) The Republic. Plato, Collected Works, in 4 vols, vol. 3, Moscow: Mysl’, pp. 79–420 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirkham R.L. (1992) Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popova O.V. (ed.) (2018) “Post-truth Politics” and Populism, Saint Petersburg: Skifia-print (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P. (2011) The Post-Truth Campaign // The New York Times, December 23, 2011 // https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/opinion/krugman-thepost-truth-campaign.html, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">RAPR Experts: Black Swans Are Circling above Us. Public Action in the “Zeroing” Condition (2020). CROS, April 9, 2020. Available at: https://vc.ru/marketing/119016-eksperty-raso-chernye-lebedi-kruzhat-nad-nami-publichnoe-deystvie-v-usloviyah-obnuleniya, accessed 21.05.2020 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Künne W. (2003) Conceptions of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly on His Priorities for 2020 (2020). United Nations Secretary- General, January 22, 2020. Available at: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2020-01-22/secretary-generalsremarks-the-general-assembly-his-priorities-for-2020-bilingual-delivered-scrolldown-for-all-english-version, accessed 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lasswell H.D. (1927) Propaganda Technique in the World War, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner &amp; Co, Ltd; New York: Alfred A. Knopf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shestov L. (1993) Potestas Clavium (The Power of Keys). Shestov L., Works, in 2 vols, vol. 1, Moscow: Nauka, pp. 15–312 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mathieu-Dairnvaell G.-M. (2013) Histoire Edifiante et Curieuse de Rothschild Ier, Roi des Juifs, Paris: Hachette Livre-BnF.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smorgunov L.V. (ed.) (2018) Public Policy: Institutions, Digitalization, Development, Moscow: Aspect Press Ltd (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Norris P., Inglehart R. (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Authoritarian-populism, New York: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tesich S. (1992) A Government of Lies. The Nation, no 254(1), pp. 6–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly on His Priorities for 2020 (2020) // United Nations Secretary-General, January 22, 2020 //https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2020-01-22/secretary-generalsremarks-the-general-assembly-his-priorities-for-2020-bilingual-delivered-scrolldown-for-all-english-version, дата обращения 21.05.2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vinogradov V.V. (1999) The History of Words, Moscow: Institut russkogo yazyka (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tesich S. (1992) A Government of Lies // The Nation, no 254(1), pp. 6–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volodenkov S.V. (2019) Influence of Internet Communication Technologies on Contemporary Social and Political Processes: Scenarios, Challenges, and Actors. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no 5, pp. 341–364 (in Russian). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.16</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
