centeroКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, правоOutlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law2542-02402587-9324Center for Crisis Society Studies10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-6centero-620Research ArticleСоциальные трансформацииSocial TransformationsЦифровая экономика и тенденции политического развития современных обществDigital Economy and Trends of Political Development in Modern Societieshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-4299НечаевВ. Д.NechaevV. D.

Владимир Дмитриевич Нечаев

доктор политических наук, доцент, вице-президент Российской ассоциации политической науки, ректор

299053, Университетская ул., д. 33, Севастополь, Российская Федерация

Vladimir D. Nechaev

DSc in Politics, Assistant Professor, Vice President of the Russian Association of Political Science

299053, Universitetskaya St., 33, Sevastopol, Russian Federation

vdnechaev@sevsu.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8028-7421БелоконевС. Ю.BelokonevS. Yu.

Сергей Юрьевич Белоконев

кандидат политических наук, доцент, руководитель Департамента политологии и массовых коммуникаций

125993, Ленинградский проспект, д. 49, Москва, Российская Федерация

PhD in Politics, Assistant Professor, Director of the Department of Politics and Mass Communication

129053, Leningradsky Av., 49, Moscow, Russian Federation

SYUBelokonev@fa.ruСевастопольский государственный университетРоссияSevastopol State UniversityRussian FederationФинансовый университет при Правительстве Российской ФедерацииРоссияFinancial University under the Government of the Russian FederationRussian Federation202020072020132Цифровое общество112133Copyright © Нечаев В.Д., Белоконев С.Ю., 20202020Нечаев В.Д., Белоконев С.Ю.Nechaev V.D., Belokonev S.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/620

Статья посвящена теоретическому анализу возможных последствий цифровой трансформации современных обществ. Авторы осуществляют сравнительный анализ трех политико-экономических моделей цифровой трансформации: когнитивного капитализма, экономики совместного производства и потребления (Р2Р-экономики) и цифрового тоталитаризма. Делается вывод, что данные теоретические модели отражают противоречивые тенденции развития общества на стадии цифровой трансформации. Авторы высказывают предположение, что в реальности возникнет широкий спектр смешанных политико-экономических моделей цифрового общества, каждая из которых будет включать в себя ту или иную комбинацию проанализированных идеальных типов. Реализация той или иной модели будет зависеть от группы факторов, включающих национальную структуру экономики, систему международных отношений, территориальную структуру урбанизации и способность (политическую, экономическую и технологическую) того или иного национального государства сохранять свой суверенитет в цифровом мире.

The article is devoted to a theoretical analysis of the possible consequences of the digital transformation of modern societies. The authors carry out a comparative analysis of three political and economic models of digital transformation: the cognitive capitalism model, sharing economy (the peer production economy) model and the digital totalitarianism model. It is concluded that these theoretical models reflect conflicting trends in the development of society at the stage of digital transformation. The authors suggest that in reality a wide range of mixed political and economic models of a digital society will emerge, each of which will include a particular combination of analyzed ideal types. The implementation of this or that model will depend on a group of factors, including: the national structure of the economy, the system of international relations, the territorial structure of urbanization and the ability (political, economic and technological) of a particular national state to maintain its sovereignty in the digital world.

цифровая экономикаглобальные тренды политического развитиякогнитивный капитализмэкономика совместного производствацифровой тоталитаризмцифровой колониализмцифровой суверенитетdigital economyglobal trends of political developmentcognitive capitalismpeer production economydigital totalitarianismdigital colonialismdigital sovereigntyReferencesГорц А. (2007) Знание, стоимость и капитал. К критике экономики знаний // Логос. № 4(61). С. 5–63.th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), CHI EA. 7–12 May 2016.Ефремов А.А. (2017) Формирование концепции информационного суверенитета государства // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. № 1. С. 201–215. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe (2015). European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/content/european-digital-strategy, accessed 20.05.2020.Коулман С. (2018) Может ли Интернет укрепить демократию? СПб.: Алетейя.Alizadeh T., Farid R. (2017) Political Economy of Telecommunication Infrastructure: An Investigation of the National Broadband Network Early Rollout and Pork Barrel Politics in Australia. Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, no 4, pp. 242–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.02.002Манойло А.В. (2008) Модель информационно-психологической операции в международных конфликтах // Право и политика. № 6. C. 1387–1394 // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modeli-informatsionno-psihologicheskogo-upravleniya-mezhdunarodnymi-konfliktami/viewer, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Bauwens M. (2005) The Political Economy of Peer Production. Ctheory.net, December 1, 2005. Available at: http://ctheory.net/ctheory_wp/the-political-economyof-peer-production/, accessed 20.05.2020.Матвеев И.А. (2012) Электронная экономика: сущность и этапы развития // Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. № 6(42). С. 1–11 // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnaya-ekonomika-suschnost-i-etapy-razvitiya/viewer, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Bennett W.L. (2012) The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 644, no 1, pp. 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428Польре Б. (2008) Когнитивный капитализм на марше // Политический журнал. № 2(179). С. 66–72.Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. (2001) The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities. Information Systems Journal, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 305–320. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.xПрограмма «Цифровая экономика Российской Федерации». Утверждена Распоряжением Правительства Российской Федерации от 28 июля 2017 г. № 1632-р // http://static.government.ru/media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Coglianese C., Lehr D. (2017) Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-learning Era. Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 105, no 5, pp. 1147–1223. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2928293, accessed 20.05.2020.th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), CHI EA. 7–12 May 2016.Coles-Kemp L., Ashenden D., O’Hara K. (2018) Why Should I? Cybersecurity, the Security of the State and the Insecurity of the Citizen. Politics and Governance, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 41–48. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i2.1333A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe (2015) // European Commission // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/content/european-digital-strategy, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Coleman S. (2018) Can the Internet Strengthen Democracy? Saint Petersburg: Aletheya (in Russian).Alizadeh T., Farid R. (2017) Political Economy of Telecommunication Infrastructure: An Investigation of the National Broadband Network Early Rollout and Pork Barrel Politics in Australia // Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, no 4, pp. 242–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.02.002Couldry N., Mejias U.A. (2018) Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 336–349. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418796632Bauwens M. (2005) The Political Economy of Peer Production // Ctheory.net, December 1, 2005 // http://ctheory.net/ctheory_wp/the-political-economy-of-peer-production/, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Cowan R., David P.A., Foray D. (2000) The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Industrial and Corporative Change, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 211–253. DOI: 10.1093/icc/9.2.211Bennett W.L. (2012) The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 644, no 1, pp. 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428Criado J.I., Sandoval-Almazan R., Gil- Garcia J.R. (2013) Government Innovation through Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no 4, pp. 319–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. (2001) The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities // Information Systems Journal, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 305–320. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.xDamon L. (1986) Freedom of Information versus National Sovereignty: The Need for a New Global Forum for the Resolution of Transborder Date Flow Problems. Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 262–287. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=ilj, accessed 20.05.2020.Coglianese C., Lehr D. (2017) Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-learning Era // Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 105, no 5, pp. 1147–1223 // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2928293, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Datta A. (2018) The Digital Turn in Postcolonial Urbanism: Smart Citizenship in the Making of India’s 100 Smart Cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 43, no 3, pp. 405–419. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12225Coles-Kemp L., Ashenden D., O’Hara K. (2018) Why Should I? Cybersecurity, the Security of the State and the Insecurity of the Citizen // Politics and Governance, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 41–48. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i2.1333De Filippi P., McCarthy S. (2012) Cloud Computing: Centralization and Data Sovereignty. European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 1–21. Available at: http://ejlt.org/article/view/101/234, accessed 20.05.2020.Couldry N., Mejias U.A. (2018) Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject // Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 336–349. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418796632Efremov A.A. (2017) Formation of the Concept of State Information Sovereignty. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no 1, pp. 201–215 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215Cowan R., David P.A., Foray D. (2000) The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness // Industrial and Corporative Change, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 211–253. DOI: 10.1093/icc/9.2.211Forest B. (2004) Information Sovereignty and GIS: The Evolution of “Communities of Interest” in Political Redistricting. Political Geography, vol. 23, no 4, pp. 425–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.010Criado J.I., Sandoval-Almazan R., Gil- Garcia J.R. (2013) Government Innovation through Social Media // Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no 4, pp. 319–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003Fung A. (2015) Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, vol. 75, no 4, pp. 513–522. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12361Damon L. (1986) Freedom of Information versus National Sovereignty: The Need for a New Global Forum for the Resolution of Transborder Date Flow Problems // Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 262–287 // https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=ilj, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Gilman H.R. (2016) Democracy Reinvented: Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America, USA: New America and Harvard’s Ash Center for Democratic Innovation and Governance.Datta A. (2018) The Digital Turn in Postcolonial Urbanism: Smart Citizenship in the Making of India’s 100 Smart Cities // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 43, no 3, pp. 405–419. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12225Giraud E. (2015) Subjectivity 2.0: Digital Technologies, Participatory Media and Communicative Capitalism. Subjectivity, vol. 8, no 2, pp. 124–146. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2015.5De Filippi P., McCarthy S. (2012) Cloud Computing: Centralization and Data Sovereignty // European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 1–21 // http://ejlt.org/article/view/101/234, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Gong W. (2005) Information Sovereignty Reviewed. Intercultural Communication Studies, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 119–135. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.6373&rep=rep1&type=pdf, accessed 20.05.2020.Forest B. (2004) Information Sovereignty and GIS: The Evolution of “Communities of Interest” in Political Redistricting // Political Geography, vol. 23, no 4, pp. 425–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.010Gorz A. (2007) Knowledge, Value and Capital. To the Criticism of the Knowledge Economy. Logos, no 4(61), pp. 5–63 (in Russian).Fung A. (2015) Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citi zen Participation and Its Future // Public Administration Review, vol. 75, no 4, pp. 513–522. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12361Hamari J., Sjöklint M., Ukkonen A. (2016) The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no 9, pp. 2047–2059. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23552Gilman H.R. (2016) Democracy Reinvented: Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America, USA: New America and Harvard’s Ash Center for Democratic Innovation and Governance.Hanna P., Vanclay F., Langdon E.J., Arts J. (2016) Conceptualizing Social Protest and the Significance of Protest Actions to Large Projects. Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006Giraud E. (2015) Subjectivity 2.0: Digital Technologies, Participatory Media and Communicative Capitalism // Subjectivity, vol. 8, no 2, pp. 124–146. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2015.5Havu K. (2017) The EU Digital Single Market from a Consumer Standpoint: How Do Promises Meet Means? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 146–183. DOI: 10.22381/CRLSJ9220179Gong W. (2005) Information Sovereignty Reviewed // Intercultural Communication Studies, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 119–135 // http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.6373&rep=rep1&type=pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Helbing D. (2018) Digital Fascism Rising? Towards Digital Enlightenment: Essay on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution (ed. Helbing D.), Zurich: CLU 1, ETH Zurich, pp. 99–102.Hamari J., Sjoklint M., Ukkonen A. (2016) The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no 9, pp. 2047–2059. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23552Herrera L. (2015) Citizenship under Surveillance: Dealing with the Digital Age. International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 47, no 2, pp. 354–356. DOI: 10.1017/S0020743815000100Hanna P., Vanclay F., Langdon E.J., Arts J. (2016) Conceptualizing Social Protest and the Significance of Protest Actions to Large Projects // Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006Hindman M. (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Havu K. (2017) The EU Digital Single Market from a Consumer Standpoint: How Do Promises Meet Means? // Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 146–183. DOI: 10.22381/CRLSJ9220179Irion K. (2012) Government Cloud Computing and National Data Sovereignty. Policy and Internet, vol. 4, no 3–4, pp. 40–71. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.10Helbing D. (2018) Digital Fascism Rising? // Towards Digital Enlightenment: Essay on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution (ed. Helbing D.), Zurich: CLU 1, ETH Zurich, pp. 99–102.Ismagilova E., Hughes L., Dwivedi Y.K., Raman K.R. (2019) Smart Cities: Advances in Research – An Information Systems Perspective. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 47, pp. 88–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004Herrera L. (2015) Citizenship under Surveillance: Dealing with the Digital Age // International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 47, no 2, pp. 354–356. DOI: 10.1017/S0020743815000100Janowski T. (2015) Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no 3, pp. 221–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001Hindman M. (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Jordana J. (2017) Transgovernmental Networks as Regulatory Intermediaries: Horizontal Collaboration and the Realities of Soft Power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 670, no 1, pp. 245–262. DOI: 10.1177/0002716217694591Irion K. (2012) Government Cloud Computing and National Data Sovereignty // Policy and Internet, vol. 4, no 3–4, pp. 40–71. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.10Kamolov S.G. (2017) Digital Public Governance: Trends and Risks. Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 185–194.Ismagilova E., Hughes L., Dwivedi Y.K., Raman K.R. (2019) Smart Cities: Advances in Research – An Information Systems Perspective // International Journal of Information Management, vol. 47, pp. 88–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004Karim R., Bonhi T.C., Afroze R. (2019) Governance of Cyberspace: Personal Liberty vs. National Security. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 8, no 11, pp. 2636–2641. Available at: https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/nov2019/Governance-Of-Cyberspace-Personal-Liberty-Vs-National-Security.pdf, accessed 20.05.2020.Janowski T. (2015) Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization // Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no 3, pp. 221–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001Keane J. (2013) Democracy and Media Decadence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Jordana J. (2017) Transgovernmental Networks as Regulatory Intermediaries: Horizontal Collaboration and the Realities of Soft Power // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 670, no 1, pp. 245–262. DOI: 10.1177/0002716217694591Kim S., Lee J. (2012) E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, vol. 72, no 6, pp. 819–828. DOI: 10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.xKamolov S.G. (2017) Digital Public Governance: Trends and Risks // Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 185–194.Klusterman R.C. (2010) This Is not America: Embedding the Cognitive- cultural Urban Economy. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, vol. 92, no 2, pp. 131–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00338.xKarim R., Bonhi T.C., Afroze R. (2019) Governance of Cyberspace: Personal Liberty vs. National Security // International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 8, no 11, pp. 2636–2641 // https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/nov2019/Governance-Of-Cyberspace-Personal-Liberty-Vs-National-Security.pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Knuth R. (1999) Sovereignty, Globalism, and Information Flow in Complex Emergencies. Information Society, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.1080/019722499128637Keane J. (2013) Democracy and Media Decadence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kostakis V. (2012) The Political Economy of Information Production in the Social Web: Chances for Reflection on Our Institutional Design. Contemporary Social Science, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 305–319. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.691988Kim S., Lee J. (2012) E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government // Public Administration Review, vol. 72, no 6, pp. 819–828. DOI: 10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.xKostakis V., Roos A., Bauwens M. (2016) Towards a Political Ecology of the Digital Economy: Socio-environmental Implications of Two Competing Value Models. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 18, pp. 82–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002Klusterman R.C. (2010) This Is not America: Embedding the Cognitive cultural Urban Economy // Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, vol. 92, no 2, pp. 131–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00338.xKwet M. (2019) Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South. Race and Class, vol. 60, no 4, pp. 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172Knuth R. (1999) Sovereignty, Globalism, and Information Flow in Complex Emergencies // Information Society, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.1080/019722499128637Lee C.-P., Chang K., Berry F.S. (2011) Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, vol. 71, no 3, pp. 444–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.xKostakis V. (2012) The Political Economy of Information Production in the Social Web: Chances for Reflection on Our Institutional Design // Contemporary Social Science, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 305–319. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.691988Loader B.D., Mercea D. (2011) Introduction Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics. Information Communication and Society, vol. 14, no 6, pp. 757–769. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648Kostakis V., Roos A., Bauwens M. (2016) Towards a Political Ecology of the Digital Economy: Socio-environmental Implications of Two Competing Value Models // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 18, pp. 82–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002Mahmoudi D., Levenda A. (2016) Beyond the Screen: Uneven Geographies, Digital Labor, and the City of Cognitive-cultural Capitalism. TripleC, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 99–220. Available at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/155/, accessed 20.05.2020.Kwet M. (2019) Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South // Race and Class, vol. 60, no 4, pp. 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172Mann M., Daly A. (2019) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism. Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 379–395. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418806091Lee C.-P., Chang K., Berry F.S. (2011) Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective // Public Administration Review, vol. 71, no 3, pp. 444–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.xManoylo A.V. (2008) The Model of Information- psychological Operation in International Conflicts. Low and Politics, no 6, pp. 1387–1394. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modeli-informatsionno-psihologicheskogo-upravleniya-mezhdunarodnymi-konfliktami/viewer, accessed 20.05.2020 (in Russian).Loader B.D., Mercea D. (2011) Introduction Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics // Information Communication and Society, vol. 14, no 6, pp. 757–769. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648Martin C.J. (2016) The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism? Ecological Economics, vol. 121, pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027Mahmoudi D., Levenda A. (2016) Beyond the Screen: Uneven Geographies, Digital Labor, and the City of Cognitivecultural Capitalism // TripleC, vol.14, no 1, pp. 99–220 // https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/155/, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Matveev I.A. (2012) Electronic Economy: Essence and Stages of Development. Management of Economic Systems: Electronic Scientific Journal, no 6(42), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnaya-ekonomika-suschnost-i-etapy-razvitiya/viewer, accessed 20.05.2020 (in Russian).Mann M., Daly A. (2019) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism // Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 379–395. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418806091Mueller M., Mathiason J., Klein H. (2007) The Internet and Global Governance: Principles and Norms for a New Regime. Global Governance, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 237–254. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01302007Martin C.J. (2016) The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism? // Ecological Economics, vol. 121, pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027Nechushtai E. (2018) Could Digital Platform Capture the Media through Infrastructure. Journalism, vol. 19, no 8, pp. 1043–1058. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917725163Mueller M., Mathiason J., Klein H. (2007) The Internet and Global Governance: Principles and Norms for a New Regime // Global Governance, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 237–254. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01302007Negroponte N. (1999) Being Digital, New York: Knopf.Nechushtai E. (2018) Could Digital Platform Capture the Media through Infrastructure // Journalism, vol. 19, no 8, pp. 1043–1058. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917725163OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015 (2015), Paris: OECD Publishing.Negroponte N. (1999) Being Digital, New York: Knopf.Pereira G.V., Parycek P., Falco E., Kleinhans R. (2018) Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review. Information Polity, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 143–162. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170067OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015 (2015), Paris: OECD Publishing. Pereira G.V., Parycek P., Falco E.,Polre B. (2008) Cognitive Capitalism on the March. Political Journal, no 2(179), pp. 66–72 (in Russian).Kleinhans R. (2018) Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review // Information Polity, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 143–162. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170067Powers S. (2014) Towards Information Sovereignty. Beyond NETmundial: The Roadmap for Institutional Improvements to the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem, Philadelphia: Center for Global Communication Studies, pp. 90–99.Powers S. (2014) Towards Information Sovereignty // Beyond NETmundial: The Roadmap for Institutional Improvements to the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem, Philadelphia: Center for Global Communication Studies, pp. 90–99.Price M. (2002) Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Price M. (2002) Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”. Approved by Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2017. No. 1632-r. Available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf, accessed 20.05.2020 (in Russian).Rabari Ch., Storper M. (2015) The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 27–42. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu021Rabari Ch., Storper M. (2015) The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 27–42. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu021Richardson L. (2015) Performingthe Sharing Economy // Geoforum,vol. 67, pp. 121–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.004Richardson L. (2015) Performing the Sharing Economy. Geoforum, vol. 67, pp. 121–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.004Scott A.J. (2008) Social Economy of Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cites, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Scott A.J. (2008) Social Economy of Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cites, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Scott A., Peters M.A. (2013) Cognitive- Cultural Production, Digital Labor and the New Frontiers of Knowledge // Knowledge Cultures, vol. 1, no 4, pp. 167–178 // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281502483_Cognitive-Cultural_Production_Digital_Labour_And_The_New_Frontiers_Of_Knowledge_A_Conversation_With_Allen_J_Scott, дата обращения 20.05.2020.Scott A., Peters M.A. (2013) Cognitive- Cultural Production, Digital Labor and the New Frontiers of Knowledge. Knowledge Cultures, vol. 1, no 4, pp. 167–178. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281502483_Cognitive-Cultural_Production_Digital_Labour_And_The_New_Frontiers_Of_Knowledge_A_Conversation_With_Allen_J_Scott, accessed 20.05.2020.Seely P. (2016) Envision the Digital Sustainability Panopticon: A Thought Experiment of How Big Data May Help Advancing Sustainability in the Digital Age // Sustainability Science, vol. 11, no 5, pp. 845–854. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5Seely P. (2016) Envision the Digital Sustainability Panopticon: A Thought Experiment of How Big Data May Help Advancing Sustainability in the Digital Age. Sustainability Science, vol. 11, no 5, pp. 845–854. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5Spencer D. (2017) Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: The Politics of Production and Digital Technologies // Work, Employment and Society, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 142–152. DOI: 10.1177/0950017016645716Spencer D. (2017) Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: The Politics of Production and Digital Technologies. Work, Employment and Society, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 142–152. DOI: 10.1177/0950017016645716Taylor L. (2017) What Is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally // Big Data and Society, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717736335Taylor L. (2017) What Is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally. Big Data and Society, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717736335Thatcher J., O’Sullivan D., Mahmoudi D. (2016) Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 34, no 6, pp. 990–1006. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816633195Thatcher J., O’Sullivan D., Mahmoudi D. (2016) Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 34, no 6, pp. 990–1006. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816633195Turner G. (2010) Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn, London: Sage.Turner G. (2010) Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn, London:Weber R.H. (2010) Internet of Things – New Security and Privacy Challenges // Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008Sage. Weber R.H. (2010) Internet of Things – New Security and Privacy Challenges. Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008West D.M. (2005) Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.West D.M. (2005) Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Wolfson T. (2014) Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Wolfson T. (2014) Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Youmans W.L., York, J.C. (2012) Social Media and the Activist Toolkit: User Agreements, Corporate Interests, and the Information Infrastructure of Modern Social Movements // Journal of Communication, vol. 62, no 2, pp. 315–329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.xYoumans W.L., York, J.C. (2012) Social Media and the Activist Toolkit: User Agreements, Corporate Interests, and the Information Infrastructure of Modern Social Movements. Journal of Communication, vol. 62, no 2, pp. 315–329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.xZeng J., Stevens T., Chen Y. (2017) China’s Solution to Global Cyber Governance: Unpacking the Domestic Discourse of “Internet Sovereignty” // Politics and Policy, vol. 45, no 3, pp. 432–464. DOI: 10.1111/polp.12202Zeng J., Stevens T., Chen Y. (2017) China’s Solution to Global Cyber Governance: Unpacking the Domestic Discourse of “Internet Sovereignty”. Politics and Policy, vol. 45, no 3, pp. 432–464. DOI: 10.1111/polp.12202

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.