<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">centero</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-0240</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-9324</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Center for Crisis Society Studies</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">centero-251</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Американская военная доктрина в современных условиях</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>US military doctrine in the contemporary conditions</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кривопалов</surname><given-names>Алексей Алексеевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Krivopalov</surname><given-names>Alexey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">krivopalov@centero.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Центр изучения кризисного общества<country>Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кривопалов А.А., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кривопалов А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Krivopalov A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/251">https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/251</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются основные положения американских доктринальных документов, опубликованных в 2015 г. Анализ содержащихся в них неявных умолчаний и противоречий позволяет сделать вывод о том, что основная масса недостатков американского военного планирования проявилась на уровне политики и стратегии, а не тактики или оперативных решений. Вместо того чтобы преодолевать исторически характерную для США фундаментальную несогласованность между внешнеполитическими и военно-стратегическими целями. Америка по-прежнему предпочитает полагаться главным образом на свое технологическое превосходство в военной области. Последнее, однако, позволяет выигрывать сражения, но не войны</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the main provisions of the US doctrine documents published in 2015. Analysis of their unclear omissions and contradictions makes it possible to conclude that most of the defects of the US military planning have appeared at the level of policy and strategy but not at the level of tactics or operative decisions. Instead of overcoming the fundamental disconnect between foreign policy and strategic objectives that is characteristic of the United States, the White House chooses to rely primarily on its supremacy in military technology. This allows the US to win battles - but not wars.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Politics</kwd><kwd>strategy</kwd><kwd>international relations</kwd><kwd>doctrine</kwd><kwd>overextension</kwd><kwd>Политика</kwd><kwd>стратегия</kwd><kwd>международные отношения</kwd><kwd>доктрина</kwd><kwd>перенапряжение</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Б.а. Угрозы // Зарубежное военное обозрение, 2015. № 7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Б.а. Угрозы // Зарубежное военное обозрение, 2015. № 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Барабанов М., Макиенко К., Пухов Р. Военная реформа: На пути к новому облику российской армии. Аналитический доклад международного дискуссионного клуба «Валдай». М., 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Барабанов М., Макиенко К., Пухов Р. Военная реформа: На пути к новому облику российской армии. Аналитический доклад международного дискуссионного клуба «Валдай». М., 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Люттвак Э. Стратегия Византийской империи. М., 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Люттвак Э. Стратегия Византийской империи. М., 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Люттвак Э. Стратегия. Логика войны и мира. М., 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Люттвак Э. Стратегия. Логика войны и мира. М., 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маначинский А.Я., Дудчак А.В. Военный потенциал Китая. Центр стратегической конъюнктуры. М., 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Маначинский А.Я., Дудчак А.В. Военный потенциал Китая. Центр стратегической конъюнктуры. М., 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Молчанов Г. Военно-политическая обстановка в различных регионах мира // Зарубежное военное обозрение, 2015. № 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Молчанов Г. Военно-политическая обстановка в различных регионах мира // Зарубежное военное обозрение, 2015. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шаклеина Т.А. Россия и США в мировой политике. М., 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шаклеина Т.А. Россия и США в мировой политике. М., 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Corum J.S. The roots of blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German military reform. University Press of Ransas, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Corum J.S. The roots of blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German military reform. University Press of Ransas, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kelly T.K., Dobbins J., Shlapak D.A., Gompert D.C., Heginbotham E., Chalk P., Thrall L. The U.S. Army and Asia, 2030-2040. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kelly T.K., Dobbins J., Shlapak D.A., Gompert D.C., Heginbotham E., Chalk P., Thrall L. The U.S. Army and Asia, 2030-2040. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National security strategy. February, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">National security strategy. February, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O'Connell C., Wenger J.W., Hansen M.L. Measuring and retaining the U.S. Army's deployment experience. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O'Connell C., Wenger J.W., Hansen M.L. Measuring and retaining the U.S. Army's deployment experience. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Obama. The Vox Conversation. Part II. Foreign Policy // http://www.vox.com/a/barack-obama-interview-vox-conversation/obama-foreign-policy-transcript.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Obama. The Vox Conversation. Part II. Foreign Policy // http://www.vox.com/a/barack-obama-interview-vox-conversation/obama-foreign-policy-transcript.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pirnie B. Everybody wanted tanks. Heavy forces in operation «Iraqi freedom» // Joint Forces Quarterly, 2005. Issue 39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pirnie B. Everybody wanted tanks. Heavy forces in operation «Iraqi freedom» // Joint Forces Quarterly, 2005. Issue 39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson L., Miller P.D., Gordon IV J., Decker J., Schwille M., Cohen R.S. Improving strategic competence. Lessons from 13 years of war. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson L., Miller P.D., Gordon IV J., Decker J., Schwille M., Cohen R.S. Improving strategic competence. Lessons from 13 years of war. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The 2014 quadrennial defense review (QDR) and defense strategy: Issues for Congress. February 24, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The 2014 quadrennial defense review (QDR) and defense strategy: Issues for Congress. February 24, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The national military strategy of the United States of America. The United States military's contribution to the national security. June, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The national military strategy of the United States of America. The United States military's contribution to the national security. June, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
