centeroКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, правоOutlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law2542-02402587-9324Center for Crisis Society Studies10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-3-68-82centero-21Research ArticleАзия: вызовы и перспективыAsia: Challenges and PerspectivesOТ ОПЕКИ К ГРАЖДАНСКОМУ КОНТРОЛЮ: КАК ИЗМЕНИЛАСЬ РОЛЬ ТУРЕЦКОЙ АРМИИ?FROM GUARDIANSHIP TO CIVILIAN CONTROL: HOW DID THE TURKISH MILITARY GET HERE?https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-9195КУТАЙАкарKUTAYAcar

факультет политической науки и международных отношений, Восточно- Средиземноморский Университет

Мерсин ул., 10, Фамагуста, 5000, Турецкая Республика Северного Кипра

Faculty of Political Science and International Relations, Eastern  Mediterranean University

10, Mersin St, Famagusta, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, 5000

acar.kutay@emu.edu.trВосточно-Средиземноморский УниверситетКипрEastern Mediterranean UniversityCyprus201730102017103Армия и общество в современном мире6882Copyright © КУТАЙ А., 20172017КУТАЙ А.KUTAY A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/21

В статье рассматривается трансформация военно-гражданских отношений в Турции на пути  от опеки со стороны армии к гражданскому контролю. Для того чтобы произвести подобный  анализ, в статье рассмотрены следующие аспекты проблемы. Автор описывает пути, по которым проходила институционализация военного влияния на граждан, начиная от военного переворота 1960 г. и заканчивая анализом событий начала 2000-х гг. В работе  приведен ряд важнейших событий и процессов, протекавших в 2000-х гг., во время правления Партии справедливости и развития. Затем автор рассматривает причины  неудачи военного переворота 15 июля 2016 г., что позволило также сделать вывод о  влиянии попытки переворота в целом. Радикальные действия турецкого правительства  станут причиной как серьезных краткосрочных, так и долгосрочных изменений в  гражданско-военных отношениях Турции, равно как и в самой организационной структуре военных сил после  недавней неудачной попытки переворота.

This article examines how civilian-military relations in Turkey have  transformed from a guardianship of the military to civilian control. To  this end, it covers the following issues. It surveys the ways in which the military has instituted its influence over civilians from the  1960 military coup up until the early 2000s. It elaborates major  events and processes that took place during the 2000s under the  AKP governments. Then, the paper describes the reasons behind the  failed coup attempt of July 15, 2016, before concluding with a  discussion of the implications of the coup attempt. There will be both  immediate and long-term implications of the radical changes that the Turkish government made to civilianmilitary relations and to the organizational structure of the  armed forces after the recent failed coup attempt.

военно-гражданские отношенияармияопекагражданский контрольвоенный переворотТурцияcivil-military relationsmilitary forcesguardianshipcivilian controlcoup d’etatTurkeyReferencesAkça İ. (2010). Military-economic structure in Turkey: present situation, problems, and solutions. TESEV Democratization Program Policy Report Series: Security Sector 2. 36. URL: http://tesev.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/Security_Sector_Policy_Report_2_Military_Economic_Structure_In_Turkey.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Akça İ. (2010). Military-economic structure in Turkey: present situation, problems, and solutions. TESEV Democratization Program Policy Report Series: Security Sector 2. 36. URL: http://tesev.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/Security_Sector_Policy_Report_2_Military_Economic_Structure_In_Turkey.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Altinay A. G. (2004). The Myth of the Military-nation: Militarism, Gender and Education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 206.Altinay A. G. (2004). The Myth of the Military-nation: Militarism, Gender and Education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 206.Aydınlı E. (2012). Civil-military relations Transformed. Journal of Democracy, 23 (1), 100–108. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2012.0004Aydınlı E. (2012). Civil-military relations Transformed. Journal of Democracy, 23 (1), 100–108. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2012.0004Aydinli E. (2009). A paradigmatic shift for the Turkish generals and an end to the coup era in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 63 (4). 581–596. DOI: 10.1353/mej.0.0092Aydinli E. (2009). A paradigmatic shift for the Turkish generals and an end to the coup era in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 63 (4). 581–596. DOI: 10.1353/mej.0.0092Bayramoğlu A. (2002). Asker and siyaset. Insel A., Bayramoglu A. (eds.). Bir Zumre, Bir Parti: Turkiye’de Ordu. Istanbul: Birikim. 59–119.Bayramoğlu A. (2002). Asker and siyaset. Insel A., Bayramoglu A. (eds.). Bir Zumre, Bir Parti: Turkiye’de Ordu. Istanbul: Birikim. 59–119.Berksoy B. (2013). Military, police and intelligence in Turkey: recent transformations and needs for reform. TESEV Democratization Program Policy Report Series: Security Sector 4. 68. URL: http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Military_Police_And Intelligence_ In_Turkey_Recent_Transformations_And_Needs_For_Reform.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Berksoy B. (2013). Military, police and intelligence in Turkey: recent transformations and needs for reform. TESEV Democratization Program Policy Report Series: Security Sector 4. 68. URL: http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Military_Police_And Intelligence_ In_Turkey_Recent_Transformations_And_Needs_For_Reform.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Cizre Ü. (2007). Prime movers, specific features and challenges of security sector reform in a Guardian State: The Case of Turkey. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Policy Paper, 17. 22.Cizre Ü. (2007). Prime movers, specific features and challenges of security sector reform in a Guardian State: The Case of Turkey. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Policy Paper, 17. 22.Cizre Ü. (2004). Problems of democratic governance of civil- military relations in Turkey and the European Union enlargement zone. European Journal of Political Research, 43 (1). 107–125.Cizre Ü. (2004). Problems of democratic governance of civil- military relations in Turkey and the European Union enlargement zone. European Journal of Political Research, 43 (1). 107–125.Cizre U., Çınar M. (2003). Turkey 2002: Kemalism, Islamism, and politics in the light of the February 28 Process. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102 (2/3). 309–330.Cizre U., Çınar M. (2003). Turkey 2002: Kemalism, Islamism, and politics in the light of the February 28 Process. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102 (2/3). 309–330.Çalışkan K. (2017). Explaining the end of military tutelary regime and the July 15 coup attempt in Turkey. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10 (1). 97–111. DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2016.1260628Çalışkan K. (2017). Explaining the end of military tutelary regime and the July 15 coup attempt in Turkey. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10 (1). 97–111. DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2016.1260628Demirel T. (2004). Soldiers and civilians: The dilemma of Turkish democracy. Middle Eastern Studies, 40 (1). 127–50.Demirel T. (2004). Soldiers and civilians: The dilemma of Turkish democracy. Middle Eastern Studies, 40 (1). 127–50.Feaver P. D. (1996). The Civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces and Society, 23 (2). 149–178.Feaver P. D. (1996). The Civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces and Society, 23 (2). 149–178.Güney A. (2002). The military, politics and post-cold war dilemmas in Turkey. Koonings K., Kruijt D. (eds.). Political armies: The military and nation building in the age of democracy. London, New York: Zed Books. 162–178.Güney A. (2002). The military, politics and post-cold war dilemmas in Turkey. Koonings K., Kruijt D. (eds.). Political armies: The military and nation building in the age of democracy. London, New York: Zed Books. 162–178.Gürcan M., Gisclon M. (2017). What is the Turkish Military’s Strategic Identity after July 15? IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. 9. URL: http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/IPM_military_policy_brief_29.09.16 _rev.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Gürcan M., Gisclon M. (2017). What is the Turkish Military’s Strategic Identity after July 15? IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. 9. URL: http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/IPM_military_policy_brief_29.09.16 _rev.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Gürcan M. (2017). Never Again! But How? State and the Military in Turkey After July 2015. IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. 16. URL: http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Never-Again_Metin-Gurcan.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Gürcan M. (2017). Never Again! But How? State and the Military in Turkey After July 2015. IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. 16. URL: http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Never-Again_Metin-Gurcan.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Gürsoy Y. (2011). The Impact of EUdriven Reforms on the Political Autonomy of the Turkish Military. South European Society and Politics, 16 (2). 293–308. DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2011.577950Gürsoy Y. (2011). The Impact of EUdriven Reforms on the Political Autonomy of the Turkish Military. South European Society and Politics, 16 (2). 293–308. DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2011.577950Hale W. (2011). The Turkish Republic and its army, 1923–1960. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 191– 201.DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572628Hale W. (2011). The Turkish Republic and its army, 1923–1960. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 191– 201.DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572628Hale W., Ozbudun E. (2009). Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. Abington: Routledge. 240. Harris G.S. (2011). Military Coups and Turkish Democracy, 1960–1980.Hale W., Ozbudun E. (2009). Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. Abington: Routledge. 240. Harris G.S. (2011). Military Coups and Turkish Democracy, 1960–1980.Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 203–213. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.573181Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 203–213. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.573181Heper M. (2011). Civil-Military Relations in Turkey: Toward a Liberal Model? Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 241–252. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572631Heper M. (2011). Civil-Military Relations in Turkey: Toward a Liberal Model? Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 241–252. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572631Huntington S.P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil military relations. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 534.Huntington S.P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil military relations. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 534.Insel A. (2003). The AKP and normalizing democracy in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102 (2). 293–308.Insel A. (2003). The AKP and normalizing democracy in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102 (2). 293–308.Isiksel T. (2013). Between text and context: Turkey’s tradition of authoritarian constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (3). 702–726.Isiksel T. (2013). Between text and context: Turkey’s tradition of authoritarian constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (3). 702–726.Jacoby T. (2003). For the people, of the people and by the military: the regime structure of modern Turkey. Political Studies, 51 (4). 669–685.Jacoby T. (2003). For the people, of the people and by the military: the regime structure of modern Turkey. Political Studies, 51 (4). 669–685.Janowitz M. (1960). The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: The Free Press. 464.Janowitz M. (1960). The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: The Free Press. 464.Jenkins G. (2007). Continuity and Change: Prospects for Civil-Military Relations in Turkey. International Affairs, 83 (2). 339–355.Jenkins G. (2007). Continuity and Change: Prospects for Civil-Military Relations in Turkey. International Affairs, 83 (2). 339–355.Jenkins G. (2009). Between Fact and Fantasy: Turkey’s Ergenekon Investigation. Silk Road Paper. 84. URL: https://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/pdf/ SilkRoadPapers/2009_08_SRP_Jenkins_Turkey-Ergenekon.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Jenkins G. (2009). Between Fact and Fantasy: Turkey’s Ergenekon Investigation. Silk Road Paper. 84. URL: https://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/pdf/ SilkRoadPapers/2009_08_SRP_Jenkins_Turkey-Ergenekon.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2017)Jenkins G. (2005). Context and Circumstance: The Turkish Military and Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.108 p.Jenkins G. (2005). Context and Circumstance: The Turkish Military and Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.108 p.Kaplan S. (2002). Din-U Devlet all over again? The politics of military secularism and religious militarism in Turkey following the 1980 coup. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34 (01). 113–127.Kaplan S. (2002). Din-U Devlet all over again? The politics of military secularism and religious militarism in Turkey following the 1980 coup. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34 (01). 113–127.Milan F. (2016). Turkey: What hides behind a failed coup attempt. The RUSI Journal, 161(4). 28–32. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2016.1228291Milan F. (2016). Turkey: What hides behind a failed coup attempt. The RUSI Journal, 161(4). 28–32. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2016.1228291Narli N. (2011). Concordance and discordance in Turkish civil-military relations, 1980–2002. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 215–225. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572629Narli N. (2011). Concordance and discordance in Turkish civil-military relations, 1980–2002. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 215–225. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572629Narlı N. (2000). Civil-Military Relations in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 1 (1). 107–127.Narlı N. (2000). Civil-Military Relations in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 1 (1). 107–127.Sakallioğlu Ü.C. (1997). The anatomy of the Turkish military’s political autonomy. Comparative Politics, 29 (2). 151–166.Sakallioğlu Ü.C. (1997). The anatomy of the Turkish military’s political autonomy. Comparative Politics, 29 (2). 151–166.Satana Nil S. (2011). Civil-Military relations in Europe, the Middle East and Turkey. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 279–292. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572634Satana Nil S. (2011). Civil-Military relations in Europe, the Middle East and Turkey. Turkish Studies, 12 (2). 279–292. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2011.572634Sarigil Z. (2015) Public opinion and attitude towards the military and democratic consolidation in Turkey? Armed Forces and Society, 41 (2), 282–306.Sarigil Z. (2015) Public opinion and attitude towards the military and democratic consolidation in Turkey? Armed Forces and Society, 41 (2), 282–306.Sarigil Z. (2014). The Turkish military: principal or agent? Armed Forces and Society, 40 (1). 168–190.Sarigil Z. (2014). The Turkish military: principal or agent? Armed Forces and Society, 40 (1). 168–190.Sarigil Z. (2009). Deconstructing the Turkish Military’s popularity. Armed Forces and Society, 35 (4). 709–727.Sarigil Z. (2009). Deconstructing the Turkish Military’s popularity. Armed Forces and Society, 35 (4). 709–727.Tachau F., Heper M. (1983). The state, politics, and the military in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 16 (1). 17–33.Tachau F., Heper M. (1983). The state, politics, and the military in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 16 (1). 17–33.Yavuz H., Koç R. (2016). The Turkish coup attempt: the Gülen movement vs. the state. Middle East Policy, 13 (4). 136–148. DOI: 10.1111/mepo.12239Yavuz H., Koç R. (2016). The Turkish coup attempt: the Gülen movement vs. the state. Middle East Policy, 13 (4). 136–148. DOI: 10.1111/mepo.12239

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.