centeroКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, правоOutlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law2542-02402587-9324Center for Crisis Society Studies10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-1-158-175centero-16Research ArticleПолитические процессы в меняющемся миреPolitical Processes in the Changing WorldЕВРОПЕИЗМ VS ЕВРОСКЕПТИЦИЗМ В СТРАНАХ ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОЙ И ВОСТОЧНОЙ ЕВРОПЫEUROPEANISM VS EUROSCEPTICISM IN THE COUNTRIES OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-1907ГеоргиевГеоргиGeorgievGeorgy T.

Георги ГЕОРГИЕВ, доцент Университета национальной и мировой экономики.

1770, Болгария, София ул. «8-ми декември».

Georgy T. GEORGIEV, associate professor at the Faculty of International Economicsand Politics, University of National and World Economy. 

1770, Bulgaria, Sofia, ul. “8-mi dekemvri”. 

chankov_g@yahoo.comУниверситет национальной и мировой экономики.БолгарияFaculty of International Economics and Politics, University of National and World Economy.Bulgaria201701082017101Феномен современного евроскептицизма: истоки, перспективы, национальные различия158175Copyright © Георгиев Г.T., 20172017Георгиев Г.Georgiev G.T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/16

Евроскептицизм является относительно новым политическим явлением. Он разнообразен по своей природе, одна из его ключевых ипостасей – критика европеизма как официальной идеологии ЕС. Эта идеология достаточно синкретична. Она включает в себя ряд элементов старых философских доктрин – учения Гоббса и Локка, французского Просвещения, немецкой классической философии. В ее основе лежат принципы прогрессизма, универсализма, примата идеи либеральной демократии. Европеизм фактически поглотил старые доктрины консерватизма и социализма, создав на основе неолиберализма вариант квазирелигии. Ее положения формулируются и соблюдаются на уровне наднациональных европейских институтов. Евроскептицизм возрождает ряд принципов старых идеологий и противопоставляет их европеизму в рамках бескомпромиссной политической борьбы. 

Euroscepticism is a comparatively new political phenomenon. It consists of many aspects, such as critics of Europeism as a political ideology of the EU. This ideology is syncretical and includes different elements of famous political thoughts by Hobbes, Locke, French Enlightenment and German classic philosophy. The core principles of europeism are principles of progressism, universalism (which is known as ground for the ideas of liberal democracy). Today europeism has replaced traditional ideologies of conservatism and socialism and created new types of quasi-religions. The main principles of this ideology are formed and implemented on the level of supranational European institutions. On contrary, euroscepticism restores principles of traditional ideologies, being a significant oppositional actor in relation to europeism. During the last years, euroscepticism has been taking strong positions on both national and supranational levels. Especially, this can be seen referring to the experience of Central Eastern Europe, which, nontheless, has a successful story of European integration. The case of Central Eastern European countries shows a nationalistic character of euroscepticism (in its economic and political senses) and illustrates the people’s reaction on practices of the transfer of values and political practices. In Bulgaria euroscepticism remains weak – its membership is still seen as the only alternative, keeping in mind the destroying effect of the country’s shift toward democracy and market. Bulgarian euroscepticism connects with the people’s hopelessness in relation the EU as an actor, which is to deal with national problems. 

популизмевроскептицизмевропеизмнеолиберализмидеологияценностикризисереськонсерватизмнационализмразрывЕвропейский союзЕвропейский парламентЕвропейская комиссияопросывыборывосточноевропейские страныБолгарияpopulismeuroskepticismEuropeanismneo-liberalismideologyvaluescrisisheresyconservatismnationalismruptureEuropean UnionEuropean ParliamentEuropean CommissionpollselectionsEastern European countriesBulgariaReferencesБонева С. (2015). Планът за инвестиции за Европа: предпоставка за стимулиране на инвестиционната активност в ЕС в следкризисния период (2015–2020 гг.). София: Minerva. 34–46.Aron R. (1985). Histoire et Politique. Textes et Témoignages. Paris. 544.Розанваллон П. (2014). Общество равных. Москва: Московская школа гражданского просвещения. 416.Balassa B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. London: R.D. Unwin. 344.Симеонова Е. (2011). Влияние на Европейския съюз върху динамиката на вътрешнополитическите кризи в България. София: Стопанство. 240.Boneva S. (2015). The Investment Plan for Europe: a Prerequisite for Stimulating Investment Activity in the EU in the Post-Crisis Period (2015–2020.). Sofiya: Minerva. 34–46.Aron R. (1985). Histoire et politique. Textes et témoignages. Paris. 544.Gray J. (1994). After the New Liberalism. Social Research, 61 (3). 719–735.Balassa B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. London: R.D. Unwin. 344.Haas E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 552.Gray J. (1994). After the New Liberalism. Social Research, 61 (3). 719–735.Hoffman S. (1970). International Organization and the International System. International Organization, 24 (3). 389–413. DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300025972Hoffman S. (1970). International Organization and the International System. International Organization, 24 (3). 389–413. DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300025972Lukacs J. (1993). The End of the Twentieth Century and the End of the Modern Age. New York: Ticknor & Fields. 291.Haas E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 552.Manent P. (1997). Histoire intellectuelle du libéralisme. Paris. 250.Lukacs J. (1993). The End of the Twentieth Century and the End of the Modern Age. New York: Ticknor & Fields. 291.Rozanvallon P. (2014). The Society of Equals. Moskva: Moskovskaja shkola grazhdanskogo prosveshhenija. 416.Manent P. (1997). Histoire intellectuelle du libéralisme. Paris. 250.Simeonova E. (2011). The Influence of the European Union on the Dynamics of Domestic Political Crises in Bulgaria. Sofiya: Stopanstvo. 240.Topaloff L. (2012). Political Parties and Euroscepticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 258. DOI: 10.1057/9781137009685Topaloff L. (2012). Political Parties and Euroscepticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 258.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.