centeroКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, правоOutlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law2542-02402587-9324Center for Crisis Society Studies10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-1-106-121centero-15Research ArticleСоциальные трансформацииSocial TransformationsГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО И ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ СОЮЗ ВО ВРЕМЕНА КРИЗИСА: ОТ ПАРТНЕРСТВА К УГРОЗЕ?CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION IN TIMES OF CRISIS: FROM PARTNERSHIP TO THREAT?МаркеттиРаффаэлеMarchettiRaffaele

Раффаэле Маркетти, доцент (международные отношения) факультета политических наук, Libera Universitá Internazionale degli Studi Sociali, Guido Carli.

00197, Италия, Рим, Viale Romania, 32.

Raffaele Marchetti, Senior Assistant Professor in International Relations, LiberaUniversitá Internazionale degli Studi Sociali, Guido Carli.

00197, Italy, Rome, Viale Romania, 32.  

rmarchetti@luiss.itLibera Universitá Internazionale degli Studi Sociali, Guido Carli.ИталияLibera Universitá Internazionale degli Studi Sociali, Guido Carli.Italy201701082017101Феномен современного евроскептицизма: истоки, перспективы, национальные различия106121Copyright © Маркетти Р., 20172017Маркетти Р.Marchetti R.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/15

В статье проанализированы изменения взаимодействия институтов ЕС и гражданских структур. Исследуя роль гражданского общества на политической арене и в особенности в контексте европеизации, автор начинает статью рядом концептуальных замечаний. После этого в статье выявлены три фазы политического участия в ЕС: 1) 1993–2001, период, в который институциональные площадки были максимально открыты для гражданского участия на европейском уровне; 2) 2001–2014, период, в который гражданское общество играло самостоятельную роль в структуре управления ЕС; 3) 2014 по настоящий момент, период, характеризующийся повышенным вниманием к появлению и консолидации анти-ЕС истеблишмента в структурах гражданского общества. В статье проанализированы три важнейших фрейма, характерных для ЕС, после чего исследовательский фокус переносится на глобальный уровень. В заключении автор представляет ряд критических замечаний о проблемах и перспективах ЕС, принимая во внимание влияние социальной мобилизации в контексте кризиса.

The article analyses the changes in the interaction between the EU institutions and civil society organizations. The article first sets the conceptual stage by examining the role of civil society in the political arena and specifically in the context of the Europeanization. It then identifies 3 major phases of European activism: 1) 1993–2001, the period in which institutional channels were opened for civil society at the European level; 2) 2001–2014, the period in which civil society played a full role within the EU governance; 3) 2014 to present day, in which the emergence and consolidation of anti-EU establishment civil society has become a central political issue for the EU. Three specific European master frames are analyzed, before the focus is shifted to the global level. Concluding remarks are presented on the critical issue and the future prospect for the EU with reference to the impact of social mobilization from below in a context of crisis. 

Европейский Союзгражданское обществогосударственное управлениеглобализацияэкономический кризисEuropean UnionCivil SocietyGovernanceGlobalizationEconomic CrisisReferencesBobbio N. (1994). Left and Right. The Significance of a Political Distinction. Cambridge: Polity. 148.Bobbio N. (1994). Left and Right. The Significance of a Political Distinction. Cambridge: Polity. 148.Boronska-Hryniewiecka K. (2011). Europeanization of Non-State Actors: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Armstrong D., Bello V., Gilson J., Spini D. (eds.). Civil Society and International Governance. The Role of Non-State Actors in Global and Regional Regulatory Frameworks. London: Routledge. 73–91.Boronska-Hryniewiecka K. (2011). Europeanization of Non-State Actors: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Armstrong D., Bello V., Gilson J., Spini D. (eds.). Civil Society and International Governance. The Role of Non-State Actors in Global and Regional Regulatory Frameworks. London: Routledge. 73–91.Clark I. (2007). International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 224. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297009.001.0001Clark I. (2007). International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 224. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297009.001.0001Curtin D. (2003). Private Interest Representation or Civil Society Deliberation: A Contemporary Dilemma for European Governance. Social and Legal Studies, 12 (1). 55–75. DOI: 10.1177/0964663903012001844Curtin D. (2003). Private Interest Representation or Civil Society Deliberation: A Contemporary Dilemma for European Governance. Social and Legal Studies, 12 (1). 55–75. DOI: 10.1177/0964663903012001844Della Porta D., Caiani M. (2009). Social Movements and Europeization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 230. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557783.001.0001Della Porta D., Caiani M. (2009). Social Movements and Europeization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 230. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557783.001.0001Della Porta D., Fernández J., Kouki H., Mosca L. (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity. 246.Della Porta D., Fernández J., Kouki H., Mosca L. (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity. 246.Economic and Social Committee. (1999). Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on 'The Role and Contribution of Civil Society Organizations in the Building of Europe'. Brussels: CES 851/1999 (1999/C329/10).Economic and Social Committee. (1999). Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on 'The Role and Contribution of Civil Society Organizations in the Building of Europe'. Brussels: CES 851/1999 (1999/C329/10).European Commission. (2001). European Governance: A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels.European Commission. (2001). European Governance: A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels.Finnemore M., Sikkink K. (1998). International Norms Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4). 887–917. DOI: 10.1162/002081898550789Finnemore M., Sikkink K. (1998). International Norms Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4). 887–917. DOI: 10.1162/002081898550789Hassing Nielsen J., Franklin M. N. (eds.). (2016). The Eurosceptic. 2014 European Parliament Elections: Second Order or Second Rate? London: Palgrave. 265. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-58696-4_12Hassing Nielsen J., Franklin M. N. (eds.). (2016). The Eurosceptic. 2014 European Parliament Elections: Second Order or Second Rate? London: Palgrave. 265. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-58696-4_12Heidbreder E. G. (2012). Civil Society Participation in EU Governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 7 (2). 1–42. DOI: 10.12942/lreg-2012-2Heidbreder E. G. (2012). Civil Society Participation in EU Governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 7 (2). 1–42. DOI: 10.12942/lreg-2012-2Hooghe L., Marks G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/s0007123408000409Hooghe L., Marks G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/s0007123408000409Joerges C., Neyer J. (2006). Deliberative Supranationalism. Revisited. European University Institute. Working Paper LAW-20. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.963334Joerges C., Neyer J. (2006). Deliberative Supranationalism. Revisited. European University Institute. Working Paper LAW-20. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.963334Lewis D. (2001). Civil Society in Non-Western Contexts: Reflections on the Usefulness of a Concept. Civil Society Working Paper series, 13. Centre for Civil Society. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Lewis D. (2001). Civil Society in Non-Western Contexts: Reflections on the Usefulness of a Concept. Civil Society Working Paper series, 13. Centre for Civil Society. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Marchetti R. (2009). Mapping Alternative Models of Global Politics. International Studies Review, 11 (1). 133–156. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.01828.xMarchetti R. (2009). Mapping Alternative Models of Global Politics. International Studies Review, 11 (1). 133–156. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.01828.xMarchetti R. (2016). Global Strategic Engagement. States and Non-State Actors in Global Governance. Lanham: Lexington Books. 210.Marchetti R. (2016). Global Strategic Engagement. States and Non-State Actors in Global Governance. Lanham: Lexington Books. 210.Marchetti R., Tocci N. (2009). Conflict Society: Understanding the Role of Civil Society in Conflict. Global Change, Peace and Security, 21 (2). 201–217. DOI: 10.1080/14781150902872091Marchetti R., Tocci N. (2009). Conflict Society: Understanding the Role of Civil Society in Conflict. Global Change, Peace and Security, 21 (2). 201–217. DOI: 10.1080/14781150902872091Paffenholz T. (ed.). (2010). Civil Society and Peacebuilding. A Critical Assessment. Bouder: Lynne Rienner. 511.Paffenholz T. (ed.). (2010). Civil Society and Peacebuilding. A Critical Assessment. Bouder: Lynne Rienner. 511.Quittkat C., Finke B. (2008). The EU Commission Consultation Regime. Kohler-Koch B., De Bievre D., Maloney W. (eds.). Opening EU-Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges. Mannheim: University of Mannheim. 183–222.Quittkat C., Finke B. (2008). The EU Commission Consultation Regime. Kohler-Koch B., De Bievre D., Maloney W. (eds.). Opening EU-Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges. Mannheim: University of Mannheim. 183–222.Radaelli C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policies. Featherstone K., Radaelli C. (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 27–56. DOI:10.1093/0199252092.003.0002Radaelli C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policies. Featherstone K., Radaelli C. (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 27–56. DOI:10.1093/0199252092.003.0002Rumford C. (2003). European Civil Society or Transnational Social Space? Conceptions of Society in Discourses of EU Citizenship, Governance and the Democratic Deficit: An Emerging Agenda. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1). 25–43. DOI: 10.1177/1368431003006001555Rumford C. (2003). European Civil Society or Transnational Social Space? Conceptions of Society in Discourses of EU Citizenship, Governance and the Democratic Deficit: An Emerging Agenda. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1). 25–43. DOI: 10.1177/1368431003006001555Ruzza C. (2005). Europe and Civil Society: Movement Coalitions and European Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 221.Ruzza C. (2005). Europe and Civil Society: Movement Coalitions and European Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 221.Schutter O. de (2002). Europe in Search of Its Civil Society. European Law Journal, 8 (2). 198–217. DOI:10.1111/1468-0386.00150Schutter O. de (2002). Europe in Search of Its Civil Society. European Law Journal, 8 (2). 198–217. DOI:10.1111/1468-0386.00150

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.